Los Angeles, CA. On March 3, 1991, Rodney King, a 250-pound 27-year-old drunken convicted criminal, led policemen on a 115 miles/hour chase and, when stopped, first refused to come out of the car, then repeatedly attacked the 4 arresting policemen.
The policemen first tried to stun him with the electric rod they use with dangerous people who maybe armed, but he kept attacking them. Therefore, they hit him 56 times with their batons, on the arms and legs, as long as he struggled, to keep him on the floor and break his resistance. They did not know whether he was hiding a gun.
The other car occupants were also black, like Rodney; they did not attack the police and were not disturbed at all by the same policemen.
Amateur cameraman George Holliday recorded it on video. The media bought the tape, cut out King's attacks against the police, and made it look as if the police were clubbing him without provocation.
Then, they repeatedly showed the edited tape on all TV stations virtually every day for months.
The relentless showing of the tape caused a general outrage against the police and white people. Protests against such blatant opinion manipulation went ignored and unreported.
At first, investigations showed that the police were either excusable or justified under the circumstances.
Anti-administration politicians stopped at nothing to distort the incident into a racially motivated abuse by white conservatives (police included). Sheer dirty politics produced a political cowardly court action against the 4 policemen.
On February 5, 1992, the super-loaded trial against the 4 policemen took place. The jury saw the entire video, not the phony TV edition, and heard all the arguments that had been carefully kept hidden by the media from the public.
Result: the police were acquitted in the only open place where all the evidence was ever shown.
A few hours later, as a reaction to the court decision, a savage black-racist riot took place that killed 54 and injured over 2000 innocent white, Korean and other non-black races who had no connection whatsoever with the trial: they just happened to be in the places in the streets of Los Angeles where the riots started.
Someone was able to take some pictures of gruesome scenes, like the video of 4-5 black men grabbing an innocent white truck driver out of his passing truck and beating him savagely until apparently dead.
VIRTUALLY EACH ONE OF THE 54 KILLINGS AND 2000 INJURIES COULD HAVE BEEN PHOTOGRAPHED AS A HEINOUS BESTIAL ACT WITHOUT PROVOCATION (the Rodney King beating was standard procedure with white or black attacking suspects and repeatedly provoked in King’s case). EACH OF THEM WOULD HAVE BEEN ENORMOUSLY MORE SHOCKING THAN THE RELATIVELY HARMLESS AND LEGALLY CORRECT RODNEY KING BEATING.
JUST IMAGINE A DETAILED VIDEO RENDITION OF HANDS, FEET, STICKS, BRICKS, KNIVES OR WHATEVER OTHER LETHAL OBJECT HITTING THE HEAD, CUTTING THE THROAT, BREAKING THE SCULL, OPENING THE BELLY AND SPILLING BLOOD AND GUTS ALL OVER THE GROUND, BREAKING THE BONES, GAUGING THE EYES OUT, KICKING THE FACE OF INNOCENT BYSTANDERS..., BLOOD AND BRAINS GUSHING OUT OF THE MOUTH, EYES, THROAT, SCULL, MORE BONES BEING BROKEN AND CRUSHED AGAIN AND AGAIN, UNTIL AND BEYOND DEATH...
AND THEN THE DEAD AND THEIR BODY PARTS AND SHREDS BEING KICKED, STAMPED ON AND MANGLED AGAIN... (R. KING WAS ONLY HIT THE WAY ANY ONE IS SUPPOSED TO BE HIT BY BILLY CLUBS -WHICH ARE MEANT TO HIT AND CAUSE PAIN FOR CRIME STOPPING OR PREVENTION-, AND NOT EVEN HURT TO REQUIRE HOSPITAL STAY, IN SPITE OF THE 56 REALLY RESTRAINED BLOWS ...).
THE RIOTERS ALSO PERPETRATED SAVAGE LOOTING, ARSON AND DESTRUCTION THAT CAUSED DAMAGES AND LOSSES CLOSE TO 2 BILLION DOLLARS (THE POLICEMEN DAMAGED NONE AND NOTHING).
IF EACH ONE OF THOSE INCIDENTS OF BESTIALITY (REALLY, WORSE THAN BESTIAL, FOR BEASTS KILL ONLY FOR SURVIVAL) HAD BEEN RECORDED AND BROADCAST LIKE THE RODNEY KING INCIDENT, WITH THE SAME OBSESSIVE PERSISTENCE, WITHOUT EVEN FOCUSING ON WHATEVER MADE THEM LOOK THEIR WORST, THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO TIME FOR ANY OTHER PROGRAM ON TV FOR MONTHS, AND THE WHITES WOULD HAVE BEEN INSTIGATED TO EXTERMINATE THE BLACKS. BUT THE WHITES WOULD NOT HAVE DONE IT.
THE EVENT IS DEFINITELY HISTORICAL, AND IT DAMAGES THE BLACK RECORD MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE. IT IS SHEER INFAMY.
I KNOW OF NO SIMILARLY "APPROVED" OR "UNDERSTANDABLE" EVENT, IN AMERICAN HISTORY, IN WHICH THE WHITES COMMITTED ANY OPEN, PUBLICLY SUBORNED, ACT OF BARBARISM AGAINST THE BLACKS , COMPARABLE TO THE LOS ANGELES RODNEY KING RIOT BY THE BLACKS SUBORNED BY THE MEDIA AGAINST THE WHITES.
That event was a moment of shame for white America too, for it was fomented by the anti-white TV and press, and only the coward and the political race-pimps were allowed to speak, and the majority was cowered into silence.
President Bush's reaction was especially revolting: on national TV, he proclaimed with cynical opportunism that he was "stunned" by the court decision... He was neither in the trial, nor in the jury, he knew that the tape shown on TV was falsified.., as he condemned, without evidence, the American court action that he, the President of the USA, was supposed to uphold.
This very fact was despicable enough to cost him the re-election. Even his infamous statement "Read my lips" (to promise that he would not raise taxes, which he then raised) was not as infuriating for the majority of the American public as his loathsome Rodney King statement (Clinton, contemptible as he was, was thus elected by default: Presumably,the manipulated electorate chose Clinton as the only available means to get rid of Bush).
Politicians started to proclaim that the murders, beatings, thefts, burning, looting, riots and destruction's were caused by past injustices against the blacks, such as slavery, poor education, unemployment, families without fathers, etc...
In a perversion of justice, the 4 white policemen were brought to trial again, for specious reasons dressed in contrived legal cavils... And they were condemned for lesser, but fabricated, crimes..
What about the unprovoked black murderers of completely innocent bystanders? What about the barbaric unprovoked looting, sub-bestial beatings, arson, ferocious vandalism?
Why do so many whites fear not to blame the whites for the crimes of the blacks? Why are politicians so bigoted for racial injustices in favor of guilty blacks and against innocent whites?. That terrible event will be turned against the blacks, in spite of the the reality that I am sure most blacks are just as horrified by it as the whites.
There is a fiendish perversion in the general pattern of white self-flagellation that has not yet been defined. Probably a cowardly resentment by underachievers against the achievers, against the competent, against the hard workers, against those who build on their hard-earned merits rather than on unqualified rights.
That kind of people has consistently been willing to "throw away the baby with the bath water". They don't mind destroying their own family, community, race or nation to get even with those they envy: the creators, the producers, the competent, the hard workers, the winners, the builders of the wealth which the new "elite" can only plunder with their "rights" and "entitlements"...
Only that kind of people can be so obtusely hostile against their own kind - black or white - and incessantly suborn a black minority to "seek revenge" against the white.
Only that kind can intimidate the decent black majority against separating from the black extremists.
Only that kind can produce an "intellectual elite" that has taken all positions against traditional culture (complexed and cultivated by those they cannot compete with) in favor of "other cultures" that take no more than astrology, tribalism or "magic" to learn.
Only that kind can bleed their own society into bankruptcy, with taxes paid by those who produce the wealth the new pundits squander with devastating incompetence..
Only that kind rejoice in national misery in order to blame and bleed those they cannot compete with. [1330]