Kenosha Letters & others...
**********************************************************************************************************
Kenosha Letters -- Others
**********************************************************************************************
Kenosha Letters
Here are original records (some reconstructed from their censored or cut-to-size published form) of my letters published from 1996 to2001 in the "Kenosha News" newspaper (in Kenosha, Wisconsin), plus scattered unpublished commentaries and essays to be recovered and completed when (and if) I find the time. Some have been (or will be) completed beyond the newspaper restrictions.
John J.P. Caporaso
******************************************************************************
To go directly to one of the titles
below (e.g. "Machiavelli matters"), click <EDIT>, then <FIND> and then copy or
paste the title "Machiavelli matters" into the "FIND WHAT" slot of the "Find and
Replace" dialog box. Then click the "FIND NEXT" button toward the lower right
corner of the same dialog box once or until the "Machiavelli matters" essay
appears on the screen.
The art of demanding vs. the skill of
producing -- Multiculturalism
menaces to Balkanize USA” --
State
of the Union missed four afflictions -- Man
and woman are complementary -- Our children need information, not formation -- Family attacked from many sides
-- Machiavelli
matters --
Clinton's ominous snafus -- To closet or not to closet
-- Undaunted Black Pragmatism -- The "Di"
syndrome -- Where reason is not enough --
The age of Mediocracy -- Religions seem unable to stop anarchy
-- Small world, global trouble
-- It is cultures, not races
-- Public and media
immersed in rotting brew -- The leftists stew in their own juice
--
Sex makes the difference -- About sophisticated primitivism
--
The unnecessary confrontation --
When sin becomes a virtue
--
The Billary loose cannons on deck -- "Revolution" sought to trash U.S. culture
-- Conservatism may help U.S. avoid
crisis -- Popularity
made to overrule the law -- Two party rule: the evil and the stupid -- Can our parties be re-educated?
-- Clinton blunders in the Balkans -- The Clinton touch -- Clinton’s
international slaughter -- Kosovo: a historical hoax -- U.S.
medicine Trojan-horses socialized medicine -- "Abortion: Destroyer of peace"
-- Education or bigotry -- Family is always central -- Yesterday’s fantasy is today’s reality
-- What will the ‘100th monkey’ do?
-- Historic events: the genes of culture -- Pandering to homosexuals -- “Not even gods can change history”
-- De Sade’s Unheeded Metaphors -- The Ominous Verdict -- The equality fraud
-- Gore the savior -- Hell's road paved with good intentions”
--
Advance Good Riddance Obituary -- Elections by Squabbles
-- Postmodern Religion/Politics Intercourse -- Race vultures exploit "black rage"
-- Raise
the age of majority to 23 or 25 -- Dumbing of America -- Alleged genetics
--
"Sophisticated
primitives" --
Creating
www.higheryet.com --
The
unnecessary confrontation. -- A peculiar interview
***************************************************************************************
Date published: 961211 The art of demanding vs. the skill of producing --
Here are some scrambled comments on a disturbing article of a
few days ago favoring taxes and against “rich” people. The writer says that
taxes are the expression of our regard for our community. In reality, they
distance us from productive direct involvement.
The alienation of many tax
beneficiaries, in fact, is in direct proportion to the aid they receive.
Our
welfare spreads poverty because it teaches the poor the art of demanding rather
than the skill of producing.
It is the welfare poor and the unemployable who
move to high-tax states, with consequent development of endemic blight areas,
disastrous finances and industrial survival exodus.
As a manufacturer, I prefer
to move to a state where lower taxes allow me to invest more of my profits in
equipment, production and jobs.
Such results are far more and better than any
tax can produce.
At best, government “creates” more jobs for job’s sake, which
produces nothing and bleeds the nation.
Even the idle rich can be more
productive than that, because they only purchase what they can use, from people
with the necessary skill and productivity. The latter profit and create new
jobs.
The government can only lower those
skills to the standards they can impose by legislating equality downwards.
The
unions contribute by imposing promotion by seniority rather than by skill.
The
union member complaining about being held down for that reason is no longer
uncommon.
At a trade show, we were forced to hire a union member to merely watch us
erect our exhibit (he did not have the skill for it). He could only watch us
doing "his work".
“Sorry, -he said- this is
how we make our living”.
In physics, “entropy” says that the universe tends
toward chaos.
Leftist governments and unions are entropic.
Certainly, you have
heard of the Soviet Union and Cernobyl.
That’s is how the poor get poorer.
For
thousands of years, poverty induced people to work and learn skills, not to
“produce crime”.
So, the poor became rich, and the rich who didn’t measure up to
what brought them there became poor.
Social mobility, it was called.
Now, the
poor have more rights than duties; the “rich” almost only duties.
So, the rich
are forced to learn and use more skills, and the poor are “protected” from the
necessity of learning and using skills.
And the politically created economic gap
worsens, especially in the present high-tech cybernetic age.
USA was the land of
opportunity to success through free competition.
Wealth is the most impartial
form of success available. Much more than class privilege or legislated leftist
despotism.
Everyone is told he (or she, of course) has the right to become rich
in free competition.
But the government expands the meaning of “rich” to
virtually anyone who owns taxable (and mortgaged) property, to extract more
taxes, as well as expands the definition “poverty level” to justify the taxes
and create more “entitlement” voters.
As the “losers” (a term fomented by
rabble-rousing politicians) are always more numerous, they prevail in implying
an evil feeling in the political statement: “the rich guys won”.
Such a feeling
has always been there, even in the times in which the tabloids glorified the
“beautiful people”.
Capital gain tax? Many call it fraudulent extortion.
I
bought land in 1972 for $16,000/acre, built a manufacturing plant on it, and
created jobs.
Then, inflation came. The real estate taxes went up at the same
rate, and I paid those increasing taxes for 23 years, year after year.
Then, in
1994, I needed more land for my business (I had committed the sin of succeeding
in spite of the odds and taxes).
Prices for the same kind of land had reached around
$160,000-200,000 per acre, and none was available next door. So, I had to sell
and move.
The ensuing capital gain tax was nothing more than a tax on inflation
from government overspending.
What gain, if I needed over 10 times as much money
for the same land?
The added tax was a double taxation-extortion, after I had
already repeatedly paid additional every year.
Hardly any tax could be more abusive.
Controls? Another “blessing”. The government forces a business to display
notices in the most prominent places to warn employees against possible abuses
by the employer.
Why not also notices about employees’ duties?
Because the
legislators can get more votes from artificially alienated employees than from
the employers?
It is odd that the government is relentless against successful
business.
The employer who mistreats his employees is likely to fail, for he
gets the cooperation he deserves.
Well: once a bloodless rock, he can be used as
a tax-entitled “victim”.
And who pays?
Controls spawn like epidemics.
Think: a
government agency commits suicide when it resolves the problem it was created
for.
Its funding and jobs won’t be needed any longer, unless new trouble is
found or created.
Thus, new laws and rules are issued that turn more screws on life and business;
which justifies more “public service” jobs for more unneeded people, who cannot
help becoming hostile from transforming honorable citizens into law-created
criminals.
They say they do it to protect the public… I wish I had more room to
describe it here.
War of classes? Classes are a social fiction some politicians
need to homogenize people in socially engineered categories.
There are only
individuals, and they cannot be obliterated in classes.
Psychologists who declared
homosexuality “normal” did it in the same spirit as declaring diabetics normal
as such. They are, but they fight diabetes. Impatient activists appropriated and
politicized the issue.
Take premarital sex: we know that it is widely practiced, we hide or condemn the
“sin”, but not the perpetrators, unless they display it or claim special
privileges..
Lust gratification control with sin designation, and guilt feeling after
sinning, kept Western morality standing. The theory of self-esteem necessity
outlaws guilt, the self-control of the Christian ethics system.
Neutralize guilt feeling with unconditional self-esteem, and you cripple
traditional morality. Someone declares that normal marriage and gay cohabitation
are “different and equal”.
Then, cohabiting homosexuals should label their arrangement or contract any way
they want, rather than “marriage”.
When I wrote about it before, I titled my letter “To Closet or Not to Closet”,
because the focus was Machiavellian rather than moral: gays should avoid a
self-victimizing confrontation with those who resent the tampering with the most
venerable heterosexual institution.
The instinctive
heterosexual defensiveness against aggressive homosexual encroachment will never
change. Primordial defensiveness reigns, and heterosexuals are by far the
overwhelming majority.
The generalized image of homosexuality is like unmarried sex aggravated by the
same-gender intercourse. Male/female fornication is statistically much more
natural than homosexuality, but unmarried lovers would cause vehement opposition
if they considered themselves victims of, and entitled to, anything unobtainable
without marriage or conventional family.
It is not happening. Therefore we have no vigilantes horrified by fornication.
Some object that gays have taken over Hollywood. Only apparently.
Historically, gifted gays are relatively prominent in artistic and intellectual fields because oppression by conventional society often inspires artistic or other creative expression. It should have nothing to do with morality.
“Pursuit of happiness”?
But happiness and pleasure are ultimately opposites.
Today’s “Gay Pride Parades”, like the ancient “Bacchanalia”, end in sadness with
masked desperation.
Happiness necessitates lasting goals available to both heteros and homos on a
loftier-than-crotch level, where pleasure is an interlude, not a goal.
Tchaikowsky was tormented
by that dilemma and finally sublimed his repressed homosexuality into composing
immortal music.
Lord Byron chose poetry and veiled his torment. Normal sexuality (not
homosexuality) is genetic but doesn’t enslave us.
We can sublime it, because free will determines behavior.
Millions, not just virtuous monks and priests, do it for many causes.
Some homosexuals were great contributors to civilization who refused to exhibit
and promote their peculiarity.
Gays who choose confrontation ruin their chances to survive in a world in which
the survival of life is reproduction.
Finally, linking homosexuality to Paganism and heterosexuality to Christianity
can degrade to a confrontation between witches and witch hunters.
Or should we dream of an evolutionary transformation modeled after the
“impossible” dialog between Aristotle and Christ?.
Who blinks first?
JJP Caporaso
970124 Multiculturalism menaces to Balkanize USA”
Some writers who cannot master our culture embrace
“deconstructionism”, where reality is a social “construct” to be undone by
arbitrary interpretation, so that opinion replaces truth.
They downgrade culture
into race/gender, and postulate that: Cleopatra (69-30 B. C.) was black (she was from the
white European Macedonian Tolomee family, which Alexander the Great installed to rule Egypt),
Aristotle stole philosophy from the library of Alexandria (which was built
several years after Aristotle's death in 322 b.c.), Egypt, science is a patriarchal fraud, God
usurped Heaven from Goddess, and so on. Shakespeare cannot compete with Marxist,
feminist, lesbian and gay writers in universities like Princeton, Columbia,
Stanford.
Jesse Jackson heads 500 Stanford University students chanting: “He/he,
ho/ho, Western Culture’s got to go..”. Yet people from all over the world come
to America and Europe to absorb our culture.
Overnight anti-West “multicultural
consultants” sprout, but Western Culture is so multicultural, that it does no
longer consider foreign what it assimilated for millennia from other cultures.
Nevertheless, “multiculturalists” (they also deconstruct) aim to balkanize our
cultural complex into hostile fragmentations that destroyed past civilizations.
They don’t see the irony of using Western languages and ideologies to fight the
Western culture. Their enemy is history, not the West.
They slouch into one contraflop (=whatever ends up flopping toward the opposite of its goals) after another.
One
is “ebonics”, an experiment to make black illiterate prattle into a language.
Another is the “Quanzaa”, black "African-American" alternative to Christmas.
Ebonics
transforms childhood illiteracy into a lifetime handicap. The same kind of white
kid illiteracy is just as sloppy as the black, but for centuries it has been
simply corrected, not embalmed into a branding definition. Qwanzaa is even
worse, because it starts pretending that African American heritage is Swahili, a
Persian/Arabian-influenced Bantu language originated in a limited East-Africa
coast area, whereas the original African Americans came from West Africa, where
entirely different languages were spoken.
Then, the Qwanzaa “seven principles” (
Umoya, Kujichagulia, Ujima, Ujamaa, Nia, Kuumba, Imani, Swahili for: unity, self
determination, collective work & responsibility, cooperative economics, purpose,
creativity, faith) resemble a Mickey Mouse Maoism irrelevant to most African
Americans for the past 31 years.
Apolitical Christmas appeals to all races and
cultures, none excluded. It is unforgivable to widen the gap between races and
cultures that need to harmonize.
The monochrome “rainbow coalition” offered to
the black Americans may be discounted as a forgettable contraflop, but trying to
offer them culturally malignant solutions cannot pass unnoticed.
970215 State of the Union missed four afflictions
Your "State of the Union" of Feb. 1st missed 4 basic American
afflictions: (1)race-, (2)gender- and (3)class-hatred, plus (4) unneeded laws.
RACE. Demagogues have fomented anti-white racial hatred, ostensibly because the first
blacks came as slaves. But black slaves were captured by Africans who sold them
to other Africans and Arabs for centuries, before selling them to the whites.
Black Africans still now capture, sell, torture, mutilate and massacre their own
neighbors by the hundreds of thousands, and millions.
Slaves who were brought to
the USA were comparatively “fortunate” and reached higher life standards than
blacks anywhere else. Over 300,000 whites died to free them as full-fledged
Americans, because being American is a cultural, not a racial matter. Therefore
black Americans do not commit the atrocities now endemic in much of Africa.
Demagogues suborn them against the whites to obtain their compact votes, but
they cannot stop the emergence of hundreds of great black Americans, from Thomas
Sowell to Clarence Thomas, who can end the fabricated “African American”
handicaps.
GENDER. Gender chauvinism becomes male-hating feminism, which is genetically
suicidal, for 50% of woman’s genes are paternal.
This speaks unarguably for the
family, which the gender feminists oppose, to confine man to sperm-donor
functions.
So, the feminist egg donors end up with three feet in their mouth.
Class warfare of any kind has one
race main victim: the individual. None of us
can escape being an individual. Furthermore, classes like “workers” and
“capitalists” can no more fight each other than blood and heart.
Do
worker individuals who become capitalists (myriads do) automatically acquire the
evil attributes they previously ascribed to the class of the rich?
Unneeded laws
make
crimes out of problems they are invoked to solve, and criminals out of honorable
citizens who cannot conform.
So, the solutions are expected from legislators
whose overriding interest is to get reelected on the promises of resolving
presumably unresolved issues, with bureaucrats whose jobs depend on keeping the
problems unresolved and contriving more parasitic rules “for our protection”.
I
read that USA has 5% of the world population, but 80% of the world lawyers, and
that Washington DC has more lawyers than all of Japan. If so, shouldn’t lawyers
and bureaucrats legislate most of themselves out of existence?
970318 Man and woman are complementary
In response to a letter criticizing my dislike for gender
feminism, I wish I could compose madrigals to womanhood. The Crusaders learned
them almost 900 years ago from Moslem troubadours who sang to the unreachable
beauties that the rich requisitioned out of circulation.
Wrong scenario; yet it
was uplifting for the same woman who was first blamed for mankind’s evils as the
inquisitive Pandora, then as silly Eve, reputed to accept a rotten apple from a
snake who couldn’t have sold a fur to a naked millionaire on an iceberg.
Countless men and women still believe it after about 3000 years.
Apparently,
both fear the power and responsibility of woman’s existential advantage.
Even
the “lowliest” unwed mother personifies the “mother Nature” metaphor after
heterosexual conjunction. First on a primordial level, before reaching beyond
procreation.
For this, human aspiration is a free posture, not nature’s mandate,
for nature doesn’t care who survives.
A mother can naturally become a
sophisticated nutritionist, nurse, teacher, educator, psychologist, and whatever
her offspring needs. Or settle on a promising cow level.
A man can too, but he
is no promising “father Nature”.
He must prove himself all his life
relentlessly: hunt, compete, conquer, build, lead.
Typically, man builds
pyramids and mousetraps.
Woman nurtures kings and commoners.
Therefore history
is made by woman, but men make history.
A woman who disdains her natural power
sinks into imitating (“competing”) man’s treadmill.
But man/woman are devotedly
complementary, not “opposite” sexes.
Genuine feminism tried to re-route woman from
Venus to Mars, not vice versa.
Gender feminism wants woman to “transcend” the family and compete with man in
selling bonds or driving cement mixers.
It declares science a patriarchal fraud, and that all gender inclination
differences are male-imposed.
It decrees family as woman’s slavery, lesbianism as liberation from heterosexual
male oppression, western culture and white male (adding a smug racist
incongruity) as misogynous strongholds…
Some call the gender feminists “feminazis”, and I quipped about them, while
supporting the genuine feminism. Woman cannot be a gender feminist, but they
make her believe she is, by a semantic deception.
Feminazis detest man, and want woman to thunder for their oxymoronic brand of
“equality”.
I think woman would prefer the genetic differences, for they are coherent with
the triumphant rites of life.
970415 Our children need information, not formation
About 2500 years ago, the Sophists emerged in Greece.
They
were the first philosophers to teach for money and foster the craft of gain
rather than knowledge, so that gain replaced truth and morality.
Previously, teaching was obvious and unconditional, like parenting, and
philosophy searched truth and morality.
Today’s anti-Western culture teachers
resume both the venality and sophistry in an ominous way, politically organized
with periodic pedagogic upgrades.
They are a crusading class forcing the parents
to take position on the ramparts of political warfare, just like the races, man/
woman, employee/employer.
When anti-Western teachers state that they need better
remuneration and working conditions to improve teaching, they degrade education
into a consequence of their welfare, not vice versa.
They join the sophisticated
primitives of anti-Western “deconstructionism”/ “multiculturalism”, who parade
sophisticated articulations of their primitive misconceptions.
They cannot
avoid the virulent modern version of sophistic philosophy, because they are
trapped in the contradictions of ignoring and “deconstructing” a Western culture
they cannot absorb.
As true believers in the new cult, they feel the missionary
zeal to excommunicate those with a different perspective: especially the
bewildered parents.
I could go on and on about the malignant cultural fads. But
what about the serious business of learning? Children go to school to gain
knowledge, but they get opinions instead.
Today’s
deconstructionist/multicultural teaching is a FORMATION process. Teachers are
instilled a politicized pedagogy designed to influence students with multiculturalist
and relativistic fervor based on smug opinions devoid of knowledge.
Brainwashing
and formation differ only in intensity.
An activist teacher vilifying parents
who support a “parental rights amendment” and oppose condom distribution in
schools is either brainwashed or raging that parental involvement can desecrate
teacher’s catechism.
Our children need INFORMATION, NOT FORMATION, for knowledge
is the result of information. We form opinions, not facts.
“Knowledge” from
formation is an imposture.
To overcome a “Catch 22” situation, the countless
genuine teachers who have been muzzled by the present “multi-…“, “post-…“, and
“-ism…“ fads should be freed to disinfest the knowledge establishment.
Just as
Socrates and Plato killed the sophist dragons for 2400 years of posterity.
970513 Family attacked from many sides
Remember the family?
Family is not just sexual gratification,
for which dates and simple copulation would suffice, but the nucleus of life
reproduction and nurture, both sublimed in love. Yet, family is now under attack
by the government, lawyers, homosexuals, feminists, decostructionists and
leftist liberals.
Government delivered the first blow by lowering the majority
age from 21 to 18, removing erotic irresponsibility from parental control.
The
devastating consequences show in our divorce rate.
Our increased longevity and
educational requirements should have raised majority age to 23 or 25. Intrusive
legislation added insult to the damage by giving bureaucrats arrogant power over the family.
“Aid To Dependent Children” and welfare penalized marriage and father’s
involvement.
Lawyers nailed the family’s coffin with “No Fault Divorce”, which insinuated malignancy in every marital difficulty.
Politicized psychologists
branded homosexuality with a “normality” label that redefined the normal people
as “heterosexuals”.
This marginalized the normality of male/female interaction
in the reproductive familial reality.
Recognizing homosexual marriage puts
homosexuals on an unnecessary collision course with the heterosexuals.
Marriage
is upgraded by the family, not by a meddlesome government.
Considering marriage
an unconditional right facilitates a devious substitution of reproductive union
with sterile eroticism, ruthless toward the children (which makes partial-birth
abortion easier than abstinence) and a pandering for votes by irresponsible
voters, whose number increases as bellicose “entitlements” are dispensed like
“wheat and games to the populace” (a Freudian slip about politician’s contempt
for the “populace”).
Gender feminists, ignorant of woman and history, see the
family as patriarchal oppression and woman enslavement.
Deconstructionists, the Trojan
horses of our culture, are dedicated to the deactivation of the family and
Western culture, which they aim to fragment with a malignant “multiculturalism”.
They fear family as the nemesis of big government and multiculturalism.
Nuclear
and extended families harmonize in commonly agreed values and form the basis of
democratic societies from below.
Big government is imposed from above through
proliferating regulations to support bureaucracies and politicized
organizations.
They spawn victimization of workers, women, children,
minorities and races, to fabricate a lynching mood against family, individual
initiative, competition, unpoliticized education, values and secularized
religion.
Does anyone care?
970604 Machiavelli matters.
Our political parties are sometime defined “the evil and the stupid”,
because they push their wishes against the reality.
Leftist bureaucrats pervert
statistical data, naturalize hordes of unqualified and dangerous immigrants, and disguise
lies, all to create welfare-spawning votes.
Republicans, unable to relate to the
public, rely on “experts” who cause incomprehensible election defeats.
Success
favors those who cynically proclaim what the public wants to hear.
Democrats
deliver the chicken-coop to the fox by granting billions to the squanderers of
welfare and education, sacrificing the poor, old and children for votes.
Politicians abuse flattery to snare votes from people they shun. Virtue, love,
rights and morality become slime balls paraded as sacred icons because we cannot
break the vicious circles of misconceptions, deceptions and cover-ups.
Tribunals
play an unrealistic game of win-and-lose, where winners, losers, and lawyers
dispute “indisputable” evidence and use the judges and juries as game pieces .
Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527 a.d.) could have written the above.
About 500 years ago, since he
faced overwhelming prejudices and holy cows, he used a tongue-in-cheek style,
like: “Men ought not to do as they ought to do but ought to do as they do do”,
roughly equivalent to “Pray to God and keep the powder dry”, but weeding out the
metaphysical.
He proposed rules of conduct based on reality and results, rather
than on ideals and faith.
We should build on what “is”, not on what “should
be”, and then develop realistic “should be” from it.
Accordingly, personal
interest is no longer just greed, the respectable banker is not a usurer, the
entrepreneur is not an exploiter, sex is not lechery, passions are human nature.
Their desirability is measured in terms of their results, not of our
convictions.
Sociologists, historians and “Realpolitik” see Machiavelli as the herald of the one system that could finally evolve human behavior through reality. Yet, all we are told he stood for is “The goal justifies the means”, which is sanctimoniously implemented by our parties, unions, government agencies, businesses, politicized organizations and Billary.
Machiavelli never prescribed “evil” against “good”.
He exposed the problem only to expose a diagnose for a
prognosis.
So should we.
970701 Clinton's ominous snafus
Clinton’s fingernails are scratching the chalkboard of
history.
His first action in office was to order the military to admit the
homosexuals unconditionally, which made a festering gash out of a sore.
Now, he
wants the American whites to apologize to the blacks for past slavery. Against
history and truth? How many American whites had slaves? What about asking
African tribes to apologize for having captured and sold their neighbors to
America centuries ago? Nonsense: either neighbors would have captured and sold
the others if they had won the fights.
Clinton even proposes a year of racial
“conversation”, with the whites in forced apologizing submission.
No, Billary,
let’s converse in earnest, lest further falsifications of truth and history
worsen the situation irreversibly. History shows: (1) Over 600,000 white
Americans died for under 2,000,000 blacks (slaves and not) in the Civil War.
That is, 1 white died for 3 black slaves (without counting the wounded and
crippled). No one else, anywhere, anytime, sacrificed nearly as much for the
blacks. (2) Black America is freer, healthier, more prosperous and civilized
than any black (and often non-black) nation in the world. (3) Survival of black
slaves brought to America was much higher than that of their captors in Africa.
No one, anywhere, anytime, did nearly as much against the blacks as the African
blacks. Therefore, informed blacks are thankful that their enslaved ancestors
were brought to America rather than left in Africa, then liberated by the whites
who even died for it, while slavery and gigantic holocausts were and are still
persisting in Africa. (4) Thousands of black Americans owned slaves too.
Actually, American blacks and whites should celebrate their good luck. With
that, political racial vampirism would starve to death. And so would the
white-hating organizations, publications, media, politicians, educators and
history fakers who thrive on unopposed anti-white and anti-America propaganda.
Deserted by race pimps, cynical liberals and invertebrate conservatives,
courageous blacks and whites will have to start constructive harmony together.
And black /white Americans would finally evolve into their cultural brotherhood.
But, please, let’s keep political histrionics and sanctimonious vultures out of
it.
970805 To closet or not to closet
Meddling politics inject a
cancerous growth into homosexuality.
First, homosexuals have no choice but
active proselytizing, to obtain pro-gay laws, because they are less than 2%, not
the advertised 10%, of our society.
Furthermore, since politically correct
American psychologists have declared homosexuals normal, raising and converting
children into homosexuality is an efficient expedient to promote the homosexual
legal privileges.
The very fact that homosexuals frantically deny that they do
it is quite a contorted Freudian slip.
Religion, anthropology and art suggest
that the lure of sex is rooted in the darkness of forbidden mysteries, where
myth and reality converge. Therefore, sanitized nakedness in nudism camps lacks
the hidden pathos of sex taboos and induces erotic fantasies about dressed
nudists.
Since sex is the origin of life, many consider any lovemaking without
reproduction intent as an aggravated mutual masturbation. It can be branded as a
defying debauchery, if openly unleashed.
Like any unreproductive sex,
homosexuality has traditionally remained discreet to proceed undisturbed.
Legal
protection of homosexuality as a civil right exacerbates a social conflict
culminating in the gay marriage dispute.
Marriage, like sex, has one fundamental
purpose: reproduction of the species.
Sexual pleasure was created by nature, not
by man, merely as bait to reproduction. Gay marriages do not produce children
any more than sex between same-gender fat or tall people, or between corkscrews. Therefore, a law
granting the right of same-gender people to marry is grotesque. Moreover,
children raised by gay parents flaunt deviation from the natural family. I doubt
that the homosexuals wish to use gay marriage to advocate a barren society.
Gay
geniuses and leaders avoided exposure by muffling their homosexuality, in order
to work with undisturbed creativity; otherwise, we would have lost some immortal
achievements we benefit from. The militancy of gay exhibitionists has no more
right to favored political protection than that of astronomers or nurses of the
same gender pursuing mutual erotic gratification.
Besides, who could stop the
legislating government from regulating fellatio, cunnilingus, onanism, sodomy
and bisexual fornication? Homosexuals and sex gourmets would seek refuge in new
closets…
Question of morality? That and beyond, where congruity comes first.
970905 Undaunted Black Pragmatism
I read an impressive editorial (probably 1000 words) by a
brilliant black columnist on a wistful trip to her native home in S.Carolina,
reminiscing that, 35 years ago, blacks could not sit in a local restaurant, were
object to abuse, etc.
Next page, the newspaper had a timid 100-word mention of
massacres in Africa by Hutus who burned tents with 8000 Tutsis inside and hacked
hundreds of them to death, in northern Rwanda.
Days before, a dear friend told
me that the blacks are still smarting from discrimination, therefore I shouldn’t
write that they are better off in USA than anywhere else.
Perspective, please!
Why musing about a fading past more than protesting that Tutsis, Hutus, Zulus,
Somalis, Sudanese, Nigerians, Liberians, Rwandans, and many more African blacks
are torturing, massacring, selling each other into slavery still now, and still
continuing?
What would that talented columnist be doing if Rwandans, Hutus,
Sudanese or other African blacks were running the USA?
Anyone can still affirm that the
American blacks are better off in USA than anywhere else, even recognizing that
there are still racial discrimination problems to resolve.
On the other hand, other
injustices and abuses still suffered by all, including whites, were and are
often worse than racial discrimination.
Yet, their victims produce far less votes than
the victimized blacks. Therefore, we gloss over bigotry, atrocities and
massacres in most nations and cultures. Denouncing or punishing them is futile,
and can even exacerbate them. Continuous rehashing of past racial wrongs foments
insatiable resentment on both sides. It contaminates the black-American posture
with incurable hostility and fattens the race pimps. Politicians need victims to
entice their votes. Only education and undaunted goodwill can provide the racial
justice we need.
A black businessman friend of mine employs only whites, and he
says: “Today most blacks are unreliable”.
I disagree, and he overstates: “The
problem is not race, but using their troubles as excuses for irresponsibility. I
want to make a good living; I have talent and no excuses. And that’s it.”.
This
undaunted pragmatism could obviate black unemployment and disadvantages by
impartially exposing some factors politicians consider unmentionable.
971003 The "Di" syndrome
356 B.C., Herostratus a typically forgettable man, decided
to acquire an absurd and logically immortal fame by burning down the temple of
Artemis, in Ephesus, Greece, one of the Seven Wonders of the World.
He succeeded
as the first of the famous nobodies. In 1981 A.D., Diana Spencer, 20, a
stunningly photogenic beauty, married Prince Charles, to become the future queen
of of the U. K., mother of a future king, and a mutated Herostratus.
As she didn’t
fit Charles and the royal life style, she became the Windsor Dynasty translucent
Trojan horse.
Charles returned to his long-time sweetheart and Diana upstaged
him with multiple adulteries.
After the unavoidable divorce, instead of retiring into
opulent privacy, like other billionaire spouses dedicated to showy good deeds
without skills or sacrifices, she used royal and public money, plus the media
and the paparazzi, to undermine the royal family.
She even stated publicly that
Charles (father of her children) was “unfit to be a king”.
Aug. 31, 97, she died
in a 120(!)-mph car crash in a tunnel in Paris, with an Arab playboy lover, a
bodyguard and a drunken driver.
The ensuing explosion of hyperpopularity in her
favor generated a tabloid revelry with mob schmaltz.
Her tragedy overshadowed
her failure to burn the royal temple that nurtured her, created a new
misdirected fame, and vindicated the Windsors by default.
In historical
contrast, two authentic giants, Viktor Frankel, 92, and Mother Teresa, 87, died
within 5 days after Diana.
Dr. Viktor Frankel, an Austrian Jewish genius who
survived 3 Nazi Holocaust camps, created the logotherapy, an existentialist
psychological methodology that used a logic search for meaning as a therapeutic
tool: a revolutionary advance from stagnating post-Freudian psychoanalysis, to
resolve countless emotional and intellectual problems. Mother Teresa, the
towering saint who formulated and mastered her life’s meaning, epitomized holy
life itself. . There is no description good enough to depict her in this short
letter.
As an oxymoronic twist, someone compared Mother Teresa with princess Diana; like comparing a
mighty river with a pretty bubble…
As to dr. Frankel, his meaning is far beyond the mental range of mobs, tabloids
and paparazzi.
971107 Where reason is not enough
Both
Nietzsche (with misgivings) and Marx (with relish) proclaimed that God was dead.
Too many politically correct clergy secretly agree and double-preach.
Since we
cannot eliminate God without putting something in His place, we install a
deconstructed Morality cult, like that of the Goddess Reason in the French
Revolution. But this Morality cult is doomed like Goddess Reason’s because it has no
priests and proven sacred absolutes.
Despite their claims, most people prefer believing
against thinking.
The smug dismissal: “You are entitled to your opinion” is the
taste-equalizing ketchup on right and wrong, which renders opinion and truth
equally irrelevant.
About 2500 years ago, Buddha created a metaphysical-mental
process in India, and Confucius a normative familial-social system in China.
Both mentioned no god or afterlife, had behavioral rules, and were attractive
substitutes for religion. But mankind was not ready for sophisticated wisdom,
and changed them into the religions we know today.
In America, we go from
religion to an anti-Western nihilistic “deconstructionism” that approaches the
Orwellian “Love is hatred”, “Truth is falsehood” implicit in “Everyone is
entitled to any opinion”.
Traditional religion preaches DUTIES, whereas today‘s
“REASON” offers popular “RIGHTS.
Duties require discipline and facilitate
cooperation; rights attract votes and foment conflicts.
We have the vicious
political, racial, gender, cultural and other conflicts.
“Anti-hate” laws
promote hatred toward politically incorrect citizens.
Gandhi preached “Eye for
an eye makes the world blind”, and today’s persistence of eye-for-an-eye
atrocities reconfirms his wisdom.
Unionized workers call their employers
operation infamous and demand compensation for their years of “devotion” (to
infamy?) to the employer.
Condoms and chastity sermons are simultaneously delivered to school
children.
We may tell diabetics to avoid sugar but are forbidden to advise
homosexuals to avoid AIDS-infested sodomy, or to call it unnatural.
American
industry is depicted as a malefic polluter and workers-exploiter, while it
produces the world’s best sanitation, medicines, food, jobs, progress and
prosperity.
Christians, Moslems and others have behaved no better than most
atheists, but they still had undisputed rules which, if followed, would have
resolved many problems.
Our present “postmodern” society disputes those rules and the Ten Commandments
as mere patriarchal impositions. Ask any gender feminist.
971220 The age of Mediocracy
Our voting system favors the
misinformed and incompetent. They elect mediocrities like Clinton, who focus on
political correctness, vote-pandering, septic political contributions, sex
harassment, homosexuality, abortion and “racial justice”.
What can Bill/Hillary do
after failing to resolve the Bosnian and Midlle-East impasses, the tax,
healthcare and racial mess?
Take credit for the Republican-protected economy?
History disagrees.
Jump on the Green-House-Effect wagon? But is there a
greenhouse effect?.. Another flop…
Then comes the media poison pill: a black man
in shackles on Newsweek’s front page: “Should America Apologize?” (What
“America”?).
Clinton jumps centerstage, to make history, and publicly praises a
white teenager’s embarassment in front of an indigent black. It’s slavery, man!
Hate the whites! Applause.
Aren’t 600,000 white Civil-War dead enough? How many
whites owned blacks? 1 or 2%?
Over 1000 blacks owned black slaves In New Orleans
alone.
A college professor tries to explain his findings that lower intellectual
interest among blacks and Latinos is aggravated by focusing on blaming the
whites rather than on self-improvement.
Suddenly, eagerly, all the national race
pimps scurry to the TV screens and thunderously demand the professor’s social
and professional execution. But KKK and Nazi parades are still allowed and
police-protected.
What if the race-pimps run out of excuses, and the blacks have
to face each-other and admit that they are like everybody else?
We all (white, black and in-between) had
enslaved ancestors.
Then, there is sex. Straight, homo, abused, porno, and the
gender feminists demand for the politically correct petting only after the
proper male petition for the legally expressed female permission for every
creeping step of his hand under her underwear.
Armies of sex-frustrated prigs
mushroom out of nowhere and set up hate-the-man clinics and sex-abuse
witch-hunts, spiced with “suppressed-memory” recalls.
Thousands of hapless
adults and children are emotionally and socially crippled for life by the
sex-witch-hunters.
The prigs legislate against “hate crimes”, but the hate they
spawn is much more diffused and vicious than the alleged “abuse”, “greed” or
“bigotry”.
They think that their own perversion is an ordained virtue, because
it is politically correct. .
Just like those who chose Barabbas.
980104 Religions seem unable to stop anarchy
I read the Protestant message “Peace on Earth, and good will
toward man” in a Catholic church. The Catholic message is: “Peace on Earth to
the men of good will”, which stresses the basic requirement of good deeds beside
faith. The priest I asked about it said that the matter was “unimportant”.
Wrong: it is theologically fundamental. Rationalizing everything is the AIDS of
Christianity, Judaism, Islam and any revealed religion.
Without doctrinal
absolutes, each of those religions seems unable to stop the anarchy within.
The
more “progressive” or “with the times” a church becomes, the more clergy become
like doctors who join the insanity of the asylum inmates.
To wit: the gay
ministers in gay communities.
God has been democratized. He’d better like it, or
they’ll elect another god, as they do with ministers who don’t please their
parishioners. Therefore new sects mushroom every day everywhere, to sanctify
whatever the marginal deviants want to hear.
A prestigious physician
unexpectedly discontinued her famous lectures and joined a “mutual-masturbation
church”. Probably we will see her preaching against masturphobia, a newfound
hatecrime.
Perspective? In the 1618-1648 European “Thirty-Year War”, both
politicized Catholics and Protestants committed wholesale rape, torture and even
cannibalism against each other, and massacred one third of Europe, in the name
of God.
Embarrassing to remember.
Thus, history shows that religion cannot
accept politicized equality, rights without duties, and the consequent
“everything goes”.
Add the anti-Western multiculturalism, and we have a recipe
of Dr. Jekyll’s potion.
Role models? “Mother Teresa is too remote" –said the lady
on the radio- "I look up to princess Diana: with her defects and adulteries, she
is like most of us…”. Neurotic bimbos rather than heroes and saints?
200 years
ago, GWF Hegel, the fountainhead of modern thinking, stated that there are 2
kinds of men: the free, willing to die for their beliefs, and the slaves, who
compromise anything to survive. It boils down to the rare virtuous ones versus
the crowds of evil and invertebrates among us.
How do we recognize the free man?
But then, would slaves elect him or another Billary for leadership?
980203 Small world, global trouble
When I returned from Paris last
November, I wanted to relate 2 shocking experiences: the reaction to a book and
the strike by 225,000 French truckers who deliberately blocked international
transportations, causing surprising multinational damages, countless hospital
and plant shutdowns, and even murders.
Concomitant with the strike was the
celebration of the 80th Nov. 7th anniversary of the Soviet Revolution, and the
publication of the 830-page “Le Livre noir du communisme” (“Communism’s Black
Book”), by reputable scholars documenting how leftist politics concealed
international communism massacres of 85 to over 100 (perhaps 120) million dissidents.
The
strike was loudly publicized by the shocked international reaction.
The book got
some mentions, but I was unable to find or order it in any Paris bookstore.
This
was ominous in 1997-8 Europe, where only Germany and Spain have non-leftist
governments.
Back in the USA, I tried to publish about the above experience, but
I was told that that was for syndicated columnists. I again tried to buy the
book, but no one seemed to know about it.
The only mention I found in the press
was Jan. 16, in the Wall Street Journal, by Anne Applebaum, columnist of
London’s Sunday Telegraph.
Here are two unspeakable horrors:
First, the
revelation of the worst carnage by far in human history.
Second, the fact that
such a revelation is ignored or glossed over is too appalling to believe.
A
socialist bigot rationalized: “We erect altars to idols like “Liberté, Egalité,
Fraternité”, or Socialism. Then, we start digging the foundations of socialism
through the bodies of the blamed and executed dissidents. Mankind’s salvation is
worth the death of human trash”.
A Parisian leftist bureaucrat became cynically
hostile when I asked why he was disturbed by the “bourgeois greed” and not by
the communist massacres. “That is class war –he added- and war has fatalities”.
That proved my point.
In Europe, they have destroyed the asylum but preserved
the lunacy.
Is our public indifference to politicized immorality metastasizing
into apathy about the worst massacres in history? Who can shift the American
focus from Clintonian crotch operettas to such an unimaginable tragedy?
980212 It is cultures, not races
A way to worsen the racial problem
is to start a “Racial Dialog”. Races cannot dialog any more than livers or
pituitary glands.
Only individuals can “dialog” about convictions and ideas,
regardless of their race, gender, status and nationality. A white and a black,
both devoted to Communism, Capitalism, Catholicism, Islam or microbiology have
much more in common than two blacks (or two whites), who diverge in differing
ideas.
Some people obsessed with race resemble vociferous zombies who see and
hear no reality.
Understanding racial differences as morphologic rather than
cultural is the key to solving our racial conflicts.
Racial pimps and Kukluxklanners refuse the historical evidence that intraracial
(inside of a race) conflicts can be much more serious and frequent than between
races.
Conflicts within Hutus/Tutsis or other African blacks, between religions,
parties and nations anywhere on earth are incredibly worse than between whites
and blacks.
The ancestral tribes of the American black slaves used to kill or sell into
slavery a much higher percentage of their co-racial neighbors than whites versus
“coloreds” anywhere..
Gullible whites seem to crave the surrealistic guilt of owning slaves centuries
ago (maximum 1 or 2% of the white owned them).
Besides, how many black Americans would be alive or exist at all today, had not
their enslaved forefathers been brought to America?. Those who could not be sold
were too often killed or eaten by the captors.
Furthermore, the slaves would have become the captors and slave traders if they
had won the same tribal wars that enslaved them.
Even without 600,000 white dead in the Civil War, no one else in the world did
so much as the Americans to eliminate slavery (against the opposition of the
African slave-traders). Yet, we remained with racial prejudices because too many
whites and blacks are unable to distinguish between racial and cultural
differences.
We can change cultures, not races. Statements about irreconcilable differences
hide the fear that cultural harmony will put race pimps and vultures out of
business.
Expecting the originally (West-African) American blacks to switch to distorted
East-African (Swahili) “heritages” is anti-American-black, because it falsifies
and handicaps them out of the American mainstream.
In successful countries, children of any ethnic origin are educated into the
prevailing language and customs, in order to function and succeed.
Expecting the blacks to adopt primitive “ebonics” language and California-made
“Quanzaa” ignores that sophisticated English and Christmas belong more naturally
to the born American blacks than to most immigrants who came after them.
Americans who defiantly coagulate and practice African or other non-American
ethnic characteristics to affirm their identity versus white Americans act like
blind boisterous zombies programmed to self-destruct. Millions of blacks and
whites finally understand it.
There is also the problem of “rights” as a bait.. Rights attract votes but
foment hostility when they are without duties.
Duties –with or without rights- promote harmony, but require effort and
responsibility.
Blacks have been conned with mirages of unconditional rights by white and black
political vultures who even assert that duties for the blacks are exploitation
by the whites.
This takes from the blacks the incentive toward acquiring skills and forces the
whites to increase their own.
Nothing could widen the gap more between white and black, rich and poor.
Education could obviate the racial problems. It would show that races and their
differences remain immutable regardless of understanding or prejudices. It is
culture that creates prejudices, advantages and drawbacks. Demagogues tell the
blacks “education is a white thing” to keep racial tensions chaotic.
Education would show that the American blacks, as a group, would already be one
of the richest nations on earth. Education also shows that Egypt, Mesopotamia
and India (preceded by the Sumerians) were neither black nor our primary roots.
That fiction was created by the race pimps to generate a false-pride trap to
distract the blacks from an autonomous educational process, which would free
them from their exploiters.
On the other hand, what would Mesopotamians (today’s Iraqis) have to do with the
black Americans whose ancestors were raised and enslaved in West Africa? No more
than the Russians with the Zulus.
Yet, a Russian raised in Zululand is enormously more different from a Russian
raised in Russia than a Zulu raised in Russia.
Difficult to understand?
980310 Public and media immersed in rotting brew
The brew is rotting and simmering,
impenetrable, dark. Much of the public and media are immersed in it and
ostensibly comfortable.
Occasionally, a slimy, putrid bubble emerges and pops
Rodney King’s riots, Diana’s Paparazzism, Bill’s debauchery.
Some public voices
proclaim the cliché ”My mind is made up, don’t confuse me with facts”, or they must
recognize that what they want to condone is unforgivable. Oddly, the bubbly brew
connotes Goethe’s drama of Dr. Faust contracting his soul to Satan to obtain
power, youth and the lovely Gretchen.
Yet, Faust was a scholarly sage, not the
lowbrow public/media brew. We have many Faust personifications: the politicized
crowds slobber over obviously criminal gorillas, promiscuous bimbos and pornogoatish presidents as expedients to hit targets, further goals and pursue
ideologies they cannot confess openly.
Political vultures and their followers
fall into defending a doped black criminal and murderous riots to flash their
racial pietism.
Schmaltzy mobs slide into idolizing a photogenic adulteress to
cover the guilt of their lost virtues. Hillary is trapped in her Faustian
connivance with Bill’s adulteries, because she needs him to preserve her power
leftovers and her questionable place in history.
Meanwhile, Bill’s satyrism
fills the chronicles. No alternatives: the contract is irrevocable. Virtue,
fidelity, duties, merit-connected results, and man/woman/family devotion are no
longer there to go back to. They deliver our nation to the demagogues, welfare
usurers, vampiristic bureaucrats, and political maggots.
Will the Billary
carcinoma metastasize? Race and gender exploiters, fawning parasites, political
prostitutes sing the narcotic “who cares” mantra so that Billary can work on
their schemes… Bill’s popularity means votes, power, even at the cost of the
souls they have long lost…
Do we really think that the sinners of Sodom and
Gomorrah thought: “I want to be depraved, evil”? I bet they said: “I am God’s
creature. Therefore, God is with me”.
They united like corrupted workers or
professionals to monopolize their interests and those of their virtuous
counterparts.
The latter have the Faustian dilemma of exposing the evil and
confronting its reaction. Redemption comes from rising against the evil.
It’s risky, but integrity can win against skullduggery.
980406 The leftists stew in their own juice
In about the year 1800, Hegel, the most influential modern
philosopher, thought the French Revolution was the “end of history”, that is,
the ultimate synthesis of social development for all time. But it degenerated
into despotic terror. Now, we think Democracy is the ultimate.
But Democracy is
being perverted by leftist government contamination. After the USSR collapse,
the government centralization rationale had to switch to the anti-Western,
anti-family, feminist and perverted mantras, with intrusive controls and
predatory bureaucracies.
So, will democracy also fail? Not, if we let the
leftists stew in their own juice, like the Soviets.
First, the welfare state is
being crushed by its own weight.
Gender-feminism’s belligerence ("feminazism") is sinking
through the defensive phase. Our cynically fornicating president is being
defended by Anita Hill, who tried to destroy a Supreme Court judge because of
his joke about pubic hair on a bottle, and by Gloria Steinem, who sees Clinton
as a “victim” of sex addiction, not as perpetrator of malignant debauchery.
Liberal legislators act like philanthropists who practice brain surgery without
knowing anatomy.
Conservatives are unable to show that they oppose brain
butchery rather than brain surgery.
The concurrence of disguised socialism and
deconstructionist culture favors an octopus-government against democracy.
Liberal “democracy” demonizes productive citizens and multiplies the majority of
failures and help addicts in favor of more government control, which penalizes
competition, evolution and initiative. In other words, it chains freedom in
favor of an imposed equality. This recalls the conservative version of
Rousseau’s: “Man was born free but everywhere he is in chains”, whereas the
American liberal version unleashed the lethal incest of freedom with enforced
equality of results.
In that, Clinton has the satanic ability of attracting
those he exploits, of making deception look like help, and cynicism like
compassion.
How many people do we know like Clinton, with so many friends and
associates convicted, jailed, contaminated, destroyed by defamation, suicide,
“accidents”, permanently crippled in so many ways? His tacky fornication is only
one facet of his diabolic allure. Surrealistically, his popularity spreads like
an unstoppable plague.
Could his Gomorrah become the end of history?
980505 \ Sex makes the difference
Our man/woman rules are based on assumptions as wishful as
bi-directional gravity.
Sex makes the life-and-death difference.
A one-minute
copulation can involve woman for over 20 years with child, without man even
remembering it. Reproduction needs man’s craving and potency, regardless of
woman’s desire or even awareness.
Man has to prove himself and perform all his
life.
Woman is the existential metaphor: all she needs is to exist, for she is
born virtually complete, finished, and yet free to develop further.
She is
Mother Nature, and invariably symbiotic with her children.
Man’s appears
superior: one man can produce even more than one thousand children.
One
superwoman cannot produce more than about 30-40 children, no matter with how
many men.
But woman’s advantage is precisely that all she needs is one child to
be Mother Nature.
There is no Father Nature.
Since woman’s superiority
recognition could alienate and neuter man, she nurtures his conditional and
useful superiority.
Therefore matriarchy was always a welcome failure and
patriarchy a convenient success.
Ours is a temporary period in history in which
both woman and man sacrifice woman/man symbiosis on the altar of an “equality”
that only produces hostile “woman rights” and man’s desertion.
The eternal “I am
yours and you are mine”, where poetry and reality fuse, becomes a bureaucratized
psychological taboo.
“No-fault divorce” destroys 90 families for the ten it
amputates, deprives children of a potential parental attitude and sacrifices
traditional manhood Man’s sacrificial superiority is not new.
Some Calicut
(Malabar in India) tribe used to anoint a man as king and to slaughter him after
12 years. He was superior, as king. All obeyed his whims. But he was sacrificed
to the survival of his slaves.
Christianity was called “slaves’ religion”,
because the slaves were the last, but ultimately the first.
We affirm, with
condescension, that insects will inherit the Earth. We imply some dark humor in
it, but beetles are already well underway…
Probably outerspace beetles have
already invaded Earth, and we don’t know… And we still think man is the king of the
universe.
Is a sadistic god(dess) playing with us?
J
980603 About sophisticated primitivism
This newspaper allows monthly letters of maximum 350 words about
“general” matters, while it invites 13 columnists to write weekly 750-word each
about “local” matters like potholes and PTA.
I’ll try to describe within 350
words how we are being infused intellectual privitivism, relativism, gayola,
etc. It’s both general and local, like most important matters.
Our everyday life
is being infused with “deconstructionism”, which sees truth and morality as
false social “constructs”, and replaces traditional values with personal
interpretations. So, even hippies can become tenured university professors who
jumble race, gender, politics and homofornication in “postmodern” culture.
Primitive whites resent a Western culture they cannot understand, and
politicized blacks are being prompted that their race doesn’t belong.
Gender
feminists proclaim that science and family are patriarchal frauds.
Instant-intellectuals contrive sophisticated articulations of the primitive notion that
Western culture must be replaced with Balkanizing “multiculturalism” and moral
relativism, which affect our children.
Ironically, those concepts were developed
and exhaustively analyzed by the Western culture they accuse.
“Right” and
“wrong” are first scrambled, then homogenized into a “collectively shared
responsibility”, which obstructs the hometown police against crime and the U.N
against genocide in Rwanda and against the documented massacres of over a
hundred millions nonconformists by communists since 1917.
The communist culprits
avoid prosecution because Marxism contaminates the decostructionist and
anti-Western “intellectuals”.
Where will “social-justice” liquidate the next
dissidents?
History condemns the leftists, and they drown history in “social studies”
in our local schools.
“Postmodernism” prescribes the interpretation of (homo)sexual
and political “meaning” of art works, purging them of aesthetic value and
author’s mind.
5 volumes of the 60 titles of the “Oxford History of Art” have
been published to describe art only in sexual/political/Marxist terms. How many
artists would want anyone to focus on their sexuality instead of the aesthetic
value of their masterpieces?
The tenured postmodern professors keep
communicating with each other away from comprehensible public exposure, and we
end up with the demented Unabomber facing the Inquisitor who hides behind a
defensively impenetrable “intellectualism”.
Could these 350 words help the timid
and deceived majority out of the quicksands?
*********************************************************************************************************
*******************************************************************************************************************
980701 The unnecessary confrontation
A letter (April 23) to Kenosha
News misquoted the Bible: “...Just to love a (male) God with all your heart.
(Isn’t that a form of homosexuality?)”.
Fellatio/sodomy with Whom?
No reaction
was published. But the press reacts to Clinton’s appointment of an openly gay
ambassador to Luxembourg.
Could the American Psychological Association
come up with another politicized legerdemain to validate the fabricated claim that
homo-sympathizers are the majority?
Militant homosexuals also try to homo-mutate
family, education, God, Bible and most typically Judeo-Christian values.
Nature
implants the sexual drive in us only as an inducement toward reproduction. Then,
reproduction ascends to higher goals.
Homosexual gratification as a
characterizing aspiration is a non-reproductive impasse.
Aggressive homosexual
militancy alienates itself in a closed political circle.
Western morality
controls self-centered lust gratification (homo and hetero) with the sin
designation, and with guilt feeling after sinning.
Neutralizing guilt with
“self-esteem” cripples morality. Hitler, Stalin etc. had abundant self-esteem.
Militant homosexuals are not happier than orgiastic heterosexual deviants.
A
family based on homosexuality is an oxymoron. ****
Gays who want natural children
need artificial heterosexual copulation. What better self-indictment?
Calling
gay cohabitation “marriage” is like claim jumping on the most venerable
heterosexual institution, and it looks like a masochistic extrapolation.
Therefore, like any non-reproductive sexual activity, homosexuality belongs in
the closet.
Heterophobia is much more vicious than homophobia.
Moreover,
heterosexuals are at least 98% of society. Zoologist Kinsey’s 10% homosexual
figure came from a pool that included psychopaths, criminals and “temporary
homosexuals”.
“Pursuit of happiness”? Happiness and pleasure are the ultimate
opposites. “Gay Pride Parades”, worse than the ancient “Bacchanalia”, end in hypercrowded emptiness.
Both heterosexuality and homosexuality need discretion
and restraint.
Happiness necessitates self-renewing "higher yet" goals on a
loftier-than-crotch level, whereas pleasure is just an interlude.
Sexuality is
genetic but not enslaving. We can sublime it, because free will determines
behavior. Millions do it. Tchaikowsky (1849-1893) sublimed his repressed deviation into
composing immortal music. Lord Byron chose poetry and veiled his homosexuality.
Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519), probably the greatest genius in human history,
was claimed to be a homosexual. His mysteriously smiling Mona Lisa painting
(which he presumably kept with him until he died) is suspected to reveal what
only a few may be allowed to know beyond both homosexuality and
heterosexuality...
Rather than blame homosexuals, I object to one-dimensional hetero and homo
militants who handle pleasure as the ultimate goal, especially when they
requisition even God for their unnecessarily inflammatory crusades.
980805 When sin becomes a virtue
Sin is Virtue. Ignorance is
Wisdom.
When you lose a politically correct argument, just call your opponent
names. A police is doomed if he reacts in kind to an attacking criminal, but
anyone may chant “kill the cops”. Sin is becoming virtue, ignorance and
perversion are merit badges. “I cannot identify with Mother Teresa –says a woman
on the radio- but I do with Princess Diana: she is an adulteress, like us all…”
The narcissistic cult of our popular “equals” as “role models” invites us to
worship into our mirror. No more looking up. Rot where you are.
There is a
strong campaign to eliminate grades in tests and make all contestants winners in
sports.
The family is being legislated into an amoral democracy. Children may
divorce their parents.
It is easier to marry and divorce than to get a driver
license.
Western culture is the highest expression of human achievement in
history, but the primitive culturally inerts oppose it in favor of
“multiculturalism”, without understanding that Western culture is the epitome of
multiculturalism itself. Deviant and immoral behavior patterns are declared
“normal” by second-rate organizations and political groupies.
Ignorant and
selective haters will be unionized as soon as they find a politically correct
designation.
Race hatred is carefully maintained virulent to avoid the solutions
that would remove the racial disadvantages and the race pimps. It is welded
with chronic poverty, to sustain the coalition with the poverty vultures.
Self-important political hopefuls seek popularized martyrdom with carefully
faked tortures, fasts, and similar tricks. Leftists spread stupid notions that
all “rich” abuse the “poor”, without understanding that all “rich” know they
cannot survive without opening social-economic mobility to the poor.
That is why
the communist nightmare was consummated by its own ideology.
Ultra feminists proclaim
that family and children are woman’s slavery to man. But no woman owes less of
her total essence to her father than to her mother.
Would abortion advocates
prefer to have been aborted?
What about consummating it retroactively?
Of course, while I cowardly publish my full name, noble knights perform the
heroic deeds of calling me names from the shiny armor of their courageous
anonymity.
980917 The Billary loose cannons on deck
Apparently to divert
attention from his broom closet herotics, Clinton falls back on his
mass-demagoguery, but displays obtuse cynicism about integrity, honor,
responsibility and worldwide obligations.
The retaliation the anti-American
terrorists deserve should avoid the trap they hope we fall into. Yet, Clinton
swallowed the bait, instead of preparing his retaliation with the necessary
diplomatic/military/strategic sophistication beyond the present tit-for-tat
operettas. He has begun a potentially unstoppable worldwide nightmare that his
cheerleader Albright calls “the war of the future”: the only possible “two-way”
unilateral war (I thought it was an oxymoron) in which the terrorists get the
sizzling steak while we obtain only shriveled potatoes.
Hundreds of millions of
Arabs, Iraqis, Syrians, Iranians, Indonesians, Africans, Turkish/Moslems spread
from Turkey to most of Southern Siberia and Asia, and many others live scattered
in mountainous, impervious areas with less than one-person-per-mile population.
With just a primitive nuclear, biological or whatever bomb in the New York,
Chicago or Los Angeles area, they can cause havoc beyond imagination. We must
deploy enormously larger expenses, manpower and super-sophisticated weapons on
virtually deserted territories to obtain almost insignificant results.
On August
21, Clinton did the equivalent of killing two lice with two bazookas despite his
theatrical efforts to impress the world. He wrapped himself in his recycled
patriotism and reaped international sarcasm. While the public focus is on his
fornications, the prosecutors are legally required to report on
Whitewater, Travelgate, Filegate, Rose Law Firm records, Hubbell, etc.
Furthermore, the stage is crowded with the rattling skeletons of the Foster
“suicide”, criminally removed documents, papers shell-games, Hillary’s “miracle”
of "investing" $1 for a $100 thousand profit, Tyson Foods, Lippo Group, Chinagate, Teamstersgate,
and an incredible number of victims Clinton discarded like cigarette
butts.
Would you buy a used truck from Bill or leave your daughter alone with
him? Nevertheless, he is “popular”, according to unbelievable polls.
Should a
special prosecutor check the authenticity or contrived predictability of those
polls and expose the fraudulent communications by Clinton groupies to the
public?
What if all the above is on the tip of the iceberg of the leftist contamination
of America?
981017 "Revolution" sought to trash U.S. culture
Clinton’s followers are seduced by
the “revolution” of the 60s, when America tried to jettison its cultural
heritage. That cultural watershed glitched into “deconstructionist” and
neomarxistic primitivism bent on trashing 3000 years of Western history.
However, while other cultures like the Egyptian or Chinese experienced millennia
of stagnation, Western civilization was always vibrant and creative, even in
the” ‘Dark Ages”, and included the Mediterranean countries, Europe, the American
continent, comprising numerous ethnic groups and languages.
The diverse range of
Western achievements is so powerful that only a lifetime of studies can
comprehend it adequately. The hippies, Marxists, gender feminists, and other
anti-American activists themselves don’t realize that they use Western
philosophy to attack their own culture, like a dog chasing his own tail.
Over
2000 years of Western thinking were planted in Greek and Latin literature,
which began most of our cultural progress. Therefore these two languages were
the foundation of our classic education. Our Founding Fathers were raised with
such curriculum and predicated it for the following generations.
Today’s
“Clinton talk” and immorality were taught by the Sophists 2500 years ago, and
soon vivisectioned and embalmed by Socrates and disciples with a finesse never
surpassed thereafter. Average kids used to translate such writings from ancient
Greek and Latin in 10th grade.
Citizens so educated are not fooled by a Clinton
who bewitches politically naive voters with gilded flimflam. Even our
Asia-originated Judeo/Christian religions drank from the Greco-Roman well.
Thomas Aquinas used Aristotle teachings to develop the greatest theological
treatise ever.
Plato’s “Republic” is still unsurpassed, and so many other ancient
writings.
Surprisingly and unknown to most, USA is now becoming the center of
Western culture revival, from history research to the Chicago Symphony, more so
than Europe. Yet, “sex education”, narcissistic “self esteem”, charismatic
snake-oil politicians, focus on school politics and salaries rather than
curricula; drug/race/gender cultural cesspools and political prostitution
submerge the needs of our children and families, where our future originates.
Someone said that thinking itself originates from failure.
It reminds me of Rome and Italy, who endured countless ordeals to overcome the
rotten politics that wrecked ancient Greece.
981110 Conservatism may help U.S. avoid crisis
It takes more than crowing to make the sun rise.
A
catastrophic worldwide financial storm is devastating one country after another
from Asia and South America and is spreading toward Europe and USA.
It started
unheeded, emerged first in July-November 1997 in currency, banking and
industrial calamities in countries like Thailand and South Korea, then 1998 in
Malaysia, Indonesia (May), Russia (August), Brazil and China (October) and many
areas in-between, let alone Japan.
So far, the total involves disastrous
inflations, national bankruptcies, crippling unemployment, misplaced capital
depletions, and resulting poverty of such gravity that 40% of the world
population has plunged into an unprecedented depression.
All measures to help,
including huge wishful capital injections from sources like the USA, UNO, or IMF
(in socialist or liberal styles) have only deepened the problems.
Now the fear
is creeping in that America will ultimately be affected by this devastation.
Notwithstanding other evidence, one common factor in the above-mentioned
failures is that the economic activities of the countries involved were
nationalized, government controlled or state-supported to varying extents.
The
best-known case is the huge Japanese economy, where the government intrusion
with industry and banking were endemic.
Another common characteristic is the
widespread and heavy corruption of politicians and bureaucrats. None of those
countries had a true capitalistic/ democratic system with the freedom of
initiative and expression as exist in the USA. All shared intrusive government
controls and self-perpetuating bureaucracies that socialists and liberals have
in common.
Even a superficial analysis shows that America is surviving primarily
because of its basic opposition to bureaucratized economy and government ”help”.
In fact, America has so far avoided the global crisis because its conservative
leaders have defeated almost all the wishful government interventions Mr. and
Mrs. Clinton have desperately tried to push through, from socialized medicine to
the spawning of government “helps” that would only benefit the politicians,
controlling bureaucrats and politicized organizations.
Governmental blunders,
corruption and incompetent interventions that economists don’t know how to
correct caused the global financial crisis.
The merit Clinton and the leftist liberals claim for the present American
prosperity is as valid as the rooster’s belief that his dawn-crow made the sun
rise.
981204 A true believer nightmare
The 35-acre trapezoidal Jerusalem's
Temple Mount is the most precarious piece of land on Earth.
It is the Al Aqsa
Mosque and Dome of the Rock, Islam's holiest site after Mecca and Medina.
It is
also the place of the demolished Herod's Temple, which the Jews are determined
to rebuild, according to their prayer: "May it be Thy will that the Temple be
speedily rebuilt in our days..."
For literal-minded Protestants, the
reconstruction of the Temple is a precondition for Jesus' Second Coming...
Against the Jewish "irrevocable" decision, the Muslims "will defend the Islamic
holy places to the last drop of their blood"...
The Jews, on the other hand,
prudently allow the Muslims to administer the site and permit no Jew or
Christian prayer or other religious tasks on the disputed ground. The Israeli
Chief Rabbis prohibit Jews to enter the place, which was only entered by the
highest priest once a year.
Medieval sage Rashi asserted that the Temple could
only come directly from heaven, together with the Messiah. Israel's Ministry of
Religious Affairs sponsored all activities to study, plan and prepare the
reconstruction of the Temple, thus provoking the Muslim fury.
Numerous Jewish
Talmudic students are (1989) studying details of Temple service, and determining
who will conduct services in the Temple... Over 100 ritual objects, including
trumpets, lyres and lots, vestments "from flax spun by hand into sixty-stranded
threads" are being zealously prepared.
Priests will "purify their bodies with
the cremated ashes of an unblemished heifer before they enter the Temple".
Members of the Temple Institute are scouting Europe for "heifer embryos that
will be shortly implanted into cows at an Israeli cattle ranch"...
Money for
these projects will only come from Jews. Any other money will be rejected...
Historian David Solomon states: "Every day's delay is a stain on the Nation"...
One common god is worshipped by three monoteistic religions consumed by mutual
hateful intollerance.
They didn’t even learn the peaceful coexistence propensity
of many pagan religions.
Christian Romans killed far more pagans than pagan
Romans had killed Christians.
Please, God of the Jews/Christians/Moslems, would you harmonize our „true
believers“?
990114 Popularity made to overrule the law
The gullibility spell the
unrepentant Clinton and mass media have cast on the American public is
remarkable. ”Legally correct” polls insinuate that most people support a
twisted president with rubbery morality.
After being accused of perjury, he
unleashed the grotesque bombing of Iraq on Dec. 16, ’98, the day before his
scheduled impeachment hearing. Dec. 19, 1998 he stopped it, for 3 discernible
reasons beyond failure: it didn’t prevent his impeachment, he doesn’t have
enough missiles, and the cost is outrageous.
What sane commander-in-chief
preordains a “4-day-only” attack without military or strategic possibilities
other than strengthening the enemy’s resolve and ridiculing America? How many
billions does he squander, how many soldiers, ships and planes does he send to
nowhere to hit 1 flea with 3 bazookas and kill innocent bystanders?
This alone
could be reason for impeachment.
He has a weaseling explanation for his
spinning: “all is relative”.
How long before we recognize that Clinton is bent
on “deconstructing” our culture? If his “popularity” overrules the law
and the Constitution, why don’t we dismantle our courts and government in favor
of mob rule, as it happened with other famous demagogues?
Deceivers
would want to look just as handsome, charismatic and angelic as Clinton. What
else can explain the surrealistic democrat lockstep against impeachment?
They
officially denounce his moral turpitude, propose the most severe censure, and
then go straight to the White House to offer him their oiliness and servitude.
Their interests are hopelessly trapped in their fraudulent promotion that he
influenced the economy and has international statesmanship. If they succeed
against impeachment, every future president knows he can safely lie under oath,
spin weaseling morality pretzels, and use any room in the White House for
cathouse fornication.
The smug feeling of sophistication presumed in today’s
relativistic philosophy is a primary cause of general decay. With that, any
criticism can be dismissed with a contemptuous “you are entitled to your
opinion” or “everything is relative”. Clintonian weaselers are putting “However”
after each of the Ten Commandments, and menacing to mutate Washington (or USA?)
into an inmate-run asylum.
990211 Two party rule: the evil and the stupid
Over 100 potential witnesses to Clinton schemes ended in jail,
murder, suicide, fled abroad, invoked the 5th amendment, or were somehow
eliminated for deviating from the Clintonian lockstep.
“Filegate” reveals that
Clinton illegally got confidential files on notable non-Clintonians to blackmail
and/or silence Gingrich, Hyde, Livingston and countless others.
Many were
“filegated” into proposing that the unrepenting Clinton be forgiven and
immunized against future prosecution.
His State of the Union address culminated
in “mass distraction” and his proposal of federalizing the stock market through
Social Security.
Captive lawyers use junk jurisprudence to explain why no one is
above the law except Clinton.
They are the ones who can be “ethical” in
legalizing abominable conduct.
Clinton committed much worse sex “improprieties”
than senator Packwood and even increased his popularity, whereas Packwood was
politically executed. This is just as surrealistic as the House democrats’
opposition to impeaching Clinton because they had not cross-examined the
witnesses they had refused to see, or because his law-breaking is “not
impeachable”.
They insist we should not impeach Clinton because he is popular
with the voters. So were Genghis Khan, Hitler, Stalin and others while the
opinion tides supported them.
Our morality is now contaminated by
one-dimensional media who condone wrongdoing that the laws condemn. Even
churches are under pressure to approve abomination.
Clinton prevails by affinity
wherever “Princess Di” is more popular than Mother Teresa.
We have trapped
ourselves in a two-party monopoly: ” the evil and the stupid”.
Clinton’s
hijacking of the merit for our prosperity is like the claim that the cockroach
in the keel is steering the ocean liner.
What if ALL republicans vote for
impeaching Clinton and ALL democrats against? That is political prostitution
with sophisticated articulation of lucrative hypocrisy that scorns history,
culture and morality.
Evil politicians bamboozle gullible voters; and the
mediocre majority, which can be amoral in most societies, intimidates mediocre
politicians, who are the majority in most governments.
Sodom and Gomorrah’s inhabitants did not think, “I want to be evil and
depraved”. They scoffed at the happiness of demanding virtues and slouched into
the destructive addiction to easy pleasures.
990303 Can our parties be re-educated?
Posturing the unions, blacks, ultra-feminists, and homosexuals
against conservatism has become a political habit and a semantic trap.
It is
undeniable that blacks who succeed on their own are far better off than the
purely government protected, that man-hating gender feminists and
confrontational homosexuals have painted themselves into bleak corners, and that
employer-hating unions are losing contact with reality.
Beyond predicting the
disastrous results of affirmative action, conservatives advocate black progress
beyond simplistic “equality with the whites” whose maximum result would be
sterile imitation and servile gratitude to the whites.
Explaining why and how
conservatives promote women’s interests even more than the traditional
feminists, without the gender feminist hatred for man, family, and
heterosexuality would let true feminism regain its natural dignity. And
non-confrontational homosexuals can become socially, financially and politically
successful like anyone else. Unions cannot just preach class struggle against
the employers. Both unions and employers could certainly become cooperative and
mutually useful.
As long as the bargaining parties concentrate on common goals,
common necessity will prevail over the destructive class struggle. This is a
practical, psychological and emotional responsibility that employees and
employers understand better than most politicians.
The main project would be
reeducation of both parties. Honest goodwill can solve this problem.
The
republicans are doomed to lose as long as they are unable to formulate the
appropriate educational messages. Those messages must necessarily be detailed,
but the vast majority of Americans are TV watchers with a short attention span.
They want the short glib statements designed for the “general public”. That is
fortunate for the democrats, because long detailed explanations would expose
evidence against their self-defeating dogoodism.
The republicans know why the
democrats are wrong, but they cannot convey what they believe to be right. Like
the democrats, they only send us financial contribution forms and
one-dimensional questionnaires to fill with preordained answers to rhetoric
questions.
Both parties, don’t seem to trust the intelligence of contributing supporters,
although they claim the opposite.
Considering the required membership standards in today’s political
organizations, we could spin Groucho Marx’s comment: “I don’t want to be member
of a club that would accept me”.
990405 Clinton blunders in the Balkans
Tempting Armageddon, Clinton’s sophisticated primitivism can
deceive NATO/USA but he misses history’s lessons. His unconstitutional
self-glorifying war against a sovereign nation without US Congress authorization
and against international law, for “moral grounds”, spreads war in order to
“prevent spreading the war”.
His being an incurable deceiver, liar, and accused
rapist (someone may suggest euphemisms) adds nightmare to disaster.
Kosovo is a Serbian patriotic holy land where
the Serbians spilled their blood for several centuries to save Europe against
the attacking Islamism: a heroic tradition beyond life-and-death.
Without the instigation and weapons from anti-Christianity/anti-West Muslims and other foreigners, the Kosovo
ethnic Muslim Albanians would have continued their assimilation into Yugoslavia, which
is the best solution in the Balkans.
International law forbids intervention by
foreign countries. Without proper guidance, unsophisticated Kosovo Albanians can
only implement terrorism.
In every nation, terrorism by minority citizens can
only be handled with force. Especially in a multicultural approach, their
assimilation and converging evolution are the normal peaceful solution. That is
what resulted into the Western and most other cultures.
The Kosovo/Albanian
future lies in assimilation into a sister culture which has developed faster.
We
cannot embalm them in what they are now, as we try to do with the Native
Americans.
This tragically Clintonian war is only matched by Clinton’s
non-reaction to the massacres of millions of Tutsis, Hutus, Sudanese, Chinese
and many others who deserved help hundreds of times more urgently than the
Kosovo/Albanian Muslims.
He watched those atrocities with fully open eyes. The
explanation that such genocides did not menace the rest of the world would thus
make them acceptable.
They say that USA/NATO have nothing against the Orthodox-Christian Serbians.
Thus: we may kill Serbians as long as we have nothing against them.
Military
history shows how to defeat America: promote a leftist Trojan horse as American
president, let him neuter our military, demoralize and scatter them in
enormously expensive and futile deployments against world opinion, then hit USA
unexpectedly.
What did Clinton do for our military beyond forcing them into
accepting homosexuals, cutting armaments and wasting our soldiers worldwide?
Clinton is preparing to sacrifice American troops next. Only Clinton can overbalkanize
the Balkans.
990502 The Clinton touch
After “intervention” by Clinton, Haiti,
Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan and others sank and were abandoned in their worsened
misery.
Virtually all persons and countries involved in Clintonian initiatives
were fatally contaminated.
Whatever Clinton touches decays or perishes.
Only our
economy remained undamaged, because he was not allowed to influence it.
His
one-way war to Serbia “to preserve peace” and to “prevent spreading the killing
and war” is creating an expanded war and multiplying the killings.
Where was
Clinton when over 200,000 Serbs were being massacred in Bosnia and by
Iran-supported Kosovo Muslim Albanians?
Although his attacks on Serbia make no
political or military sense, they certainly work as convenient diversions from
his being accused of rape, just as his useless attacks on Iraq –still continuing
now- spelled diversion from his impeachment and strengthened Saddam Hussein.
Meanwhile,
Italy is shocked by a flood of crimes by immigrating Albanians. Many are in
jails, where they declare: “..We are better off in Italian prisons than anywhere
in Albania.” Albania stagnated for many centuries as the poorest, most
illiterate and anti-European Muslim country in Europe.
Their major pride is how much
they contributed to the Muslim Ottoman invasion against Serbia and Europe since six
centuries ago.
They embraced Islam, and became a dismembered body of discordant
communities, until they were colonized and culturally infected by communist
China and North Korea.
Now, deprived of their potential and reduced to fractious
terrorism, many Albanians are trying to find a future by fleeing to Italy and
Germany for a new way of life.
They are much worse than Milosevic, because
of their ruthless anti-Western and anti-Christian problems. The Senate unimpeachment of Clinton unleashed his
Balkan slaughter (again: anti-Western/anti-Christian).
He is now lobotomizing the American opinion about his
“unavoidable” sacrifice of “any number” of American youth and Serbian civilians.
Meanwhile, pro-Serbia Russians may manage to reenact their WW1 collapse and
their subsequent growth into USSR, after all enemies ignored them in 1917. How
would we react if, after their present collapse, they resurged by hitting our
major cities?
They could win because we cannot fight their disjointed confusion. Knowingly or
not, Clinton may be hatching the Russian-Siberian Armageddon egg.
990602 Clinton’s international slaughter
America is not Clintonland.
Clinton bombs Serbia to divert
attention from his Pornocchio image, and NATO tries to delay its own overdue
dissolution by fabricating a war pretext.
They fail, must massacre innocents “to
save our face” and brand “ethnic cleansing” a minor Serbian civil war.
Without
provocation, Clinton bombs a sovereign nation without declaring war, against the
international laws and the American Constitution.
Preventing the massacres is
his declared “humanitarian” purpose, but he kills many more, gets away with
calling the carnage “collateral damage”, and with claiming he has “nothing
against the Serbs”.
Then he declares Milosevic a “war criminal” for shooting
back Albanian Muslim terrorists (mortal enemies of Western-Christian civilization).
He sublimes his alleged rape of Juanita Broaddrick
into deliberately raping a sovereign nation, which is not even an enemy.
Clinton, the peacenik, campaigned in Europe against America’s violence in
Vietnam, and now is an unstoppable slayer of defenseless victims by bombers
hitting from a cowardly (“safe”) distance.
By proclaiming Serbian crimes without
confirmation by any international court or any other non-propaganda source, he
is creating more enemies and degrading America’s moral stature in the
unchangeable annals of history.
All this is happening because the Senate refused
to impeach him.
If we accept Clinton’s international slaughter, we become a
mindless herd of accomplices sinking into anti-Western culture barbarism.
This is America, not Clintonia.
Clinton, his subservient military/diplomatic bureaucrats and NATO
pompous puppets are degrading the historical mission of America.
Rejecting him
and killing his war may be our only way out of national disgrace.
If Clinton had
helped Albania build the necessary organization to absorb the Kosovo refugees,
instead of bombing Serbia into destruction, he would have brought primitive
Albania and Muslim Kosovan Albanians into civilization, conquered Yugoslavia’s undying
gratitude, saved countless lives and motivated Russia’s cooperation against
China. Clinton’s shallowness cannot conceive a solution for both contenders.
His one-dimensional mind can only produce a destructive lust for video-game
victories against non-opponents carefully chosen among those who don’t have a
chance to defend themselves.
He is even planning the disastrous financing and
training of ragtag Muslim “Kosovo Liberation Army” terrorists against Serbia.
The Clinton syndrome has desensitized voters to the point that they cannot feel
the unspeakable outrage of being tricked into supporting an international
murder-suicide.
990702 Kosovo: a historical hoax
Clinton’s wickedness induced
Congress to impeach him, and reelection strategy caused the Senate to unimpeach
and unleash him as an operetta Genghis Khan against Serbia, virtually at the
service of the most primitive, anti-Christian, anti-West ethnic terrorists in
Europe.
That immunized Serbia, Russia and potentially Albania against America.
Serbia, Kosovo and NATO are three more Clinton-curse targets after Haiti,
Somalia, Irak, , Bosnia, Whitewatergate, Chinagate, other Xgates and other
tragic blunders.
Like before, he and his followers celebrate the apotheosis of
his macabre victory, followed by the carefully glossed-over reality that he
brought by far much more death and destruction than Milosevic.
Now, he is
frantically manufacturing and distorting evidence of Milosevic crimes.
A
statesman should have enabled Albania to host the Kosovar refugees, earned
Albanian, Serbian and Russian gratitude, and promoted Balkan harmony.
He
added the Napoleonic delusion of conducting “the first moral war in history”
with the moral stature of a prostitute who claims virginity.
History will also
show that Serbian/Kosovar civil war casualties were neither “genocide” nor
“holocausts”.
“Saving NATO’s existence”, like reviving a zombie, is
inducing the European Union to replace the anti-Russia NATO with a European
military organization without America.
Opposing the raids and terrorism of the KLA and their Albanian and Iranian instigators
(also mortal Musllim enemies of Western-Christian civilization) was necessary, even if the
opposition was directed by an alleged “criminal” like Milosevic (3-times
democratically elected).
To fight Hitler, Roosevelt had to ally America with Stalin,
who was even worse than Hitler.
Compared to them, Milosevic is a minor pussycat.
Milosevic surrendered to protect his people against someone (Clinton) like a loathsome
terrorist or kidnapper who keeps killing hostages until he gets what he wants.
Like a hostage-killing terrorist, Clinton crows that none of his men died, but
for each American survivor he killed countless innocent non-enemy victims, as if
they were insects.
Now, let’s watch compassionate Clinton and his NATO lapdogs
forcing the return of bloodthirsty anti-Western-anti-Christian culture Kosovars to their non-homes:
like
re-injecting AIDS into a victim because a non-approved physician had cured it.
The extra-careful wording and the $5-million reward to buy evidence against
Milosevic specifically (not against a true culprit, but against a
still-to-be-proven-guilty Milosevic) may be covering a monstrous historical
hoax.
990805 U.S. medicine Trojan-horses socialized medicine
I was unexpectedly railroaded into open-heart surgery,
although I was jogging 3.5 miles daily and felt greatest. After surgery,
evidence popped that my previous chest pain was only from a healing broken rib.
Coincidental pettiness happened after changing doctors.
A receptionist rejected
me because I refused to describe my symptoms loudly with a crowd waiting behind
me.
A clerk’s refusal to schedule urgent help made me cancel a business trip to
Holland.
I’m not allowed to talk with a physician to request references or his background
previous to our first appointment. Paramedics choose a doctor for me, despite my
protests. My protests are ignored.
I go to the appointment, and busy assembly people process me. Someone comes with
impatient clipped questions, but he is the wrong doctor. I get peremptory
written instructions and sign papers with sneaky small print that I cannot read
in the allotted time.
Medics and paramedics sign nothing.
I am refused service unless I publicly reveal my birth date, insurance card,
driver license, social security, and whatever no-nonsense clerks fancy, even
when I go to a hospital-owned shop to get an earplug for swimming, in spite of
my cash payment.
I go for a test and my records falsely show that I have high blood pressure and
a never tested allergy.
Other doctors found that I was allergic to wheat (wrong) and milk (never
tested).
Other doctors, who also judged my heart surgery unnecessary, found no allergies.
Monopolized medical business snatches many hapless doctors and subtly
intimidates the competent physicians majority, who “don’t want to have any
trouble”.
They become unwitting Trojan horses of socialized medicine devastation.
Hillary Clinton glorifies European nationalized medicine, but not the drama of a
superbly competent executive lady I had hired to work foe me in London, who
couldn’t come to America, because she was dying of cervical cancer, which her
socialized medical system had diagnosed in time but scheduled for surgery too
late.
Receptionists, medical aids, lab technicians, paralegals, bookkeepers,
bureaucrats and/or their aids make determining decisions that only a
doctor-patient encounter should make.
They explain how they have good reasons.
Nothing is worse than arbitrary wrongs done for “good reasons”.
990903 "Abortion: Destroyer of peace"
Abort abortion Headline, 9 Aug. 1999: “Crime drop linked to
abortion”.
Just as brilliant as: “Headaches drop linked to decapitation”.
Did it
mean: legalizing abortions decriminalizes them? Nope.
“Legalized Abortion and
Crime” (by Steven Levitt and John Donohue) explains: “..Many women whose
children would have been most likely to commit crimes as young adults instead
chose to abort their pregnancies”.
That means that the most immature, ignorant
and uneducated wantonly pronounce and execute death sentences. However, many
non-aborted children of such women became famous scientists, philosophers,
artists and geniuses in many fields.
Even Hitler’s mother should not have
aborted, because little Adolf could have become a harmless citizen if he had
found clever sponsors and sufficient rewards for keeping quiet.
On the other
hand, some monstrous criminals born of wealthy loving parents may tempt
abortionists to abort entire generations.
We could also legislate
super-Holocaust abortions as a patriotic duty, if the outlook for next
generation’s welfare looks bleak. Besides, too many cases are not so simple.
Pundit Hillary Clinton reveals that having a mother and grandmother hate each
other could promote boundless promiscuity and mouth-to-genitals for the
male offspring.
Since my mother and grandmother were mutually sympathetic, I
wonder what made my life so exciting.
On Feb. 4, 1994, on a prayer breakfast in
Washington, DC, with Bill/Hillary Clinton sitting behind her, Mother Teresa
emphasized publicly:
“… The greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion,
because it is a war against the child – murder by the mother herself. And if we
accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people
not to kill one another?”
Hillary’s all-out campaign for unconditional
government support of abortion is well known.
On June 22, 1999 the socialist
government of Moslem Albania incongruously presented Hillary Clinton with the
Catholic “Mother Teresa Award” in Skopje, Macedonia, “…in the spirit of the
victory of mankind over inhuman action”.
The Catholic League for Religious and
Civil Rights commented: “If Hillary Clinton were a decent woman, she would not
accept this award”.
If still alive, Albanian-born Catholic Mother Teresa would
have certainly agreed.
991010 Education or bigotry
Our organizations to fight racism beat dead horses and
generate self-feeding hostilities.
America has fewer prejudices than most other
countries.
What is left is the residual lunacy that only apolitical EDUCATION
can correct.
Furthermore, we should praise America for having fought the
greatest war against racism, in which about one white man died for every 3
blacks living then in America.
No other nation did so much against slavery.
Recognition coming from such awareness promotes many times more mutual
understanding than resentful civil right crusades.
Handling innate racism with
just “bad dog!” admonitions assures trouble perpetuation.
Racism has
become the paralyzed dragon that cannot distress the damsel who doesn’t need the
knight who craves the reward for saving her.
True, the paralyzed dragon is still
a nuisance, but not as bad as the prejudices against me as a foreigner in other
countries, or against my moving to USA from South America (5 year waiting in
1955 because I was Italian, against 1 month for my German wife), or in USA
itself for employment (“no Negroes, Catholics, Hispanics or Italians”, and
“Chemist? But aren’t you Italian?”), and when I started to learn English at age
31.
I refused well-intentioned help to move into an Italian or German
neighborhood, because I wanted acculturation, not ethnic isolation.
I became
chemical research director and then started a hi-tech business, simply because I
worry more about protected alienation than about failure.
The main protection
victims are now the blacks.
Is “black” so bad that they have to be repainted as
“African American”?
Why are they told that Cleopatra was black, Aristotle stole
his philosophy from the Alexandria Library (built after his death), that
Timbuktu was a world center of books before the printing press was invented? To
make them resent, be resented, and look stupid?
They are offered help that would
only establish cultural handicaps.
The troublemakers are those, white and black,
who profit from black troubles.
All that blacks need is to cultivate knowledge and
skills.
Only self-destructive racists refuse knowledgeable and skillful
coworkers.
Who, black or white, would work with racists anyhow?
991106 Slouching into recycled socialism
Our government and the telephone companies are sliding into
symbiotic coexistence.
Calling a government agency means being pinball tossed
among answering machines.
The taxpayer wastes high telephone bills. Who gains?
The telephone company, who owes it to the government, who is indebted to the
telephone company.
They reinforce each other in an undeclared collusion, which
marginalizes the individual.
This government/big-organizations symbiosis is growing all around us, and we
keep voting a government that legislates paradoxical protection of citizen
groups against the citizen.
Example: I brought a car to a large dealership service dept. for a checkup
previous to a trip. They charged me about $1900 for repairs.
The trip was a
disaster because the most critical repairs had been paid and not done.
I was
almost killed, stalled in the middle of a speedway in a curve.
Says the car-mall
service manager: "Our service is unionized and we have to accept what they say
and charge you. There is nothing we can do".
Thus, some union/employer collusions share the interest in defrauding the
customer.
Sending and charging several high-wage men-hours for one-man-1-hour
jobs become normal.
That is: government/big-employers/organized-employees
together exploit the citizenry in a recycled socialism, manipulated in
capitalistic fashion.
Groveling media cooperate by describing the exploited and
exploiters to justify and promote progressive tightening of government controls.
Even little entrepreneurs like plumbers, electricians and others are lured into
similar deceptive conspiracies, but they and the unions end irreversibly
straight jacketed in nationwide regulations.
Even organized physicians are manipulated into forming unions that will
eventually converge physicians and HMOs into a bureaucratized medical despotism
over patients.
Medicine bureaucratization is already being rehearsed with
methodology typical of socialistic systems.
The captive doctors are baited into anti-patient protection and the patients are
intimidated and domesticated.
A doctor who has a dispute with his organization
is deprived of his patients who, like cattle, have nothing to say (even if the
appearances are carefully staged to show the opposite).
The taxpayer, the customer (or "client"), the citizen, the "working
men-and-women" are one-by-one used and bled dry to be gradually homogenized into
the "new world".
Going to court?. It is our right, but lawyer fees make sure that winning costs us more
than losing...
Have we not learned enough from the Soviet nightmare?
991205 Family is always central
In the TV show “Touched by an angel”,
a feminist angel states: “Family is a democracy”.
Democratizing the family
degenerates it.
Democracy is electoral, whereas family is a patriarchal or
matriarchal hierarchy.
In democracy, voters pre-exist and elect their leaders.
Family is the indivisible nucleus of reproductive life and civilization, in
which parents generate and raise their children.
Children electing their parents
is as absurd as a consequence choosing or erasing its only cause.
Another
apparently wise exhortation, “respect your father(mother) because he(she) is
right” is slyly anti-family. The rule has been for millennia: “Respect your
father(mother), because he(she) is your parent”, regardless of whether he is
right.
“Because he(she) is right” confuses the parent with anybody.
Unquestioning obedience to the parents builds character, trains children to face
social realities and to become parents.
The authority to resolve irreconcilable
differences then must return to the head of the family, whose concern and love
reaches much further than judges and bureaucrats can.
The objection that some
parents are unworthy is an anti-family rationalization.
Unworthy parents are
mostly conflicting narcissistic misfits who cannot characterize a family.
Democracy may heed the Machiavellian practical exhortation “Men ought not to do
as they ought to do but ought to do as they do do”, whereas family can be
inspired by healthy ideals to strive toward a “perfection” we may continuously approach
and never achieve. What else do we think evolution is or ought to be?
Democratized “role models” are poor substitutes which are
debunked when their personifications fail or are surpassed.
The family, more
than a safety haven, is an evolution nucleus to nurture and do “as they ought to
do”, also if the parents cannot do what they expect from their children.
Even a
prostitute can motivate her daughter into chastity, just as some paralyzed coach
can train an athletic team. Laws to control interaction between father, mother
and child mostly tend to hollow the family’s essence and fatten vultures who
gain from family dissolution.
Since anti-family and pro-abortion activists are politically more feared than
pro-family and pro-life citizens, government measures “to protect the family”
degenerate family and mankind in facilitating divorce, abortion and one-parent
“families”.
20000105 Yesterday’s fantasy is today’s reality
WHERETO FROM HERE?
Enter a public place naked in 1980 and you
are arrested, but not in 2000, unless you are smoking at the same time. Tell an
ethnic or black joke, and you may end in jail or jobless for life.
Yet it is OK
to ridicule any church, immerse a Crucifix in urine, or paint the Virgin Mary
surrounded by elephant excrement and rotted sex organs.
About two thirds of the blacks
and about 20% of the whites are born by unmarried women.
Furthermore, we may
shack up and murder any child while he is being born.
Years ago, a homosexual
would confess his problem to a minister and seek help. Today, the homosexual
himself may be the performing minister.
Crucifixes and prayers are forbidden in
public places, yet “in God we trust” is on our dollar bills.
“Progressive”
judges pervert the constitution through arbitrary unconstitutional decisions.
Our public schools are the anticultural fraud of the century, designed to
morally and culturally lobotomize defenseless children with ”self esteem” and
politically corrupted indoctrination, and muzzle the competent teachers in favor
of compact voting teacher unions, politicians and bureaucrats.
Too often, no proof is
necessary to convict a man of rape or child molestation.
Lives of innocent men
have been irreversibly ruined with fabricated quack “recovered-memory”
accusations by women and toddlers.
The IRS and police may arrest people and
sequester properties without due process.
Postmodern feminism fights against
males and heterosexual family, and for using males only as sperm donors.
One
generation ago Nelson Rockefeller lost the presidential candidacy because he had
been divorced.
In 1999, Clinton used the White House as a third rate cathouse to
commit multiple adulteries and depraved debauchery with interns and other
victims.
He was constitutionally impeached by the House, unconstitutionally unimpeached by the
Senate, and declared in contempt by a federal court.
Upon being accused of rape,
he scurried into a criminal undeclared war that killed countless thousands of
innocent civilians and multiplied the number of “genocide murders” his war was
supposed to prevent.
Not many years ago, the above would have been psychopathic
fantasy.
Now, the year 2000 has to cope with the Clintonian legacy.
20000208 What will the ‘100th monkey’ do?
THE 100th MONKEY BUSINESS.
In 1952, zoologists observed Macaca
Fuscata monkeys risk starvation in the island of Koshima, Japan, because they
couldn’t clean the dirt off sweet potatoes or fruits they found on the ground.
Some monkeys were taught by zoologists to wash them in creeks and ponds. That helped them, but
too slowly to influence the others, until all monkeys, close-by and distant,
almost suddenly knew how to wash the potatoes in 1958, because the number of the
learning monkeys had grown enough to motivate all the others.
The hypothetical
monkey that completed the number to make the difference was conventionally
called “the 100th monkey”.
Many people ridicule or persecute a man who insists
with warnings or exhortations about a particular danger. Mostly, they will heed him only when he is the
“100th monkey”.
Many who persist in exposing unpleasant matters like our public
schooling system, or our decaying morals, may end up demonized like senator Joe
McCarthy.
He was not preceded by the symbolic 99 that would make him the
convincing 100th monkey. His defects and blunders doomed him to failure anyhow,
and the monkeys were on the other side, but armed with the “ad hominem”
accusations typical of lynch mobs and other fanatics.
For instance, some
leftists would now accuse me of defending McCarthy because I condemn their
bigotry. The same obtusity as branding a conservative as “homophobic/
sexist/racist/Euro-male/anti-abortionist/Judeo-Christian”. In 1997, a group of
scholars published in France “The livre noir du communisme » (“The black book of
communism”), with undisputable documentation of how over 80-100 million people
had been murdered since 1917 for resisting communism. I was in Paris and
experienced knee-jerk overreaction by local leftists against the book. Later, I
saw only a German and an Italian translation of that book, until Harvard
University Press published the English version only last November (1999). Will
it have similar postmodernist leftists detractors like those I met in France?
Someone said, “Not even God can change the past”. Postmodernists are trying to
do precisely that.
It might depend on which side the 100th monkey will take. Merely for completing
the number after the 99th, or for the morality and justice of his stand?
20000307 Historic events: the genes of culture
Postmodernist “anti-cultural education” is based on the
dogmatic and unscientific assumption that children are cultural aliens to
their parents. The parents who raise them are “intrusive, oppressive”, if not
directed by “professionals” (that is, psychologic pedagogy technicians, social
workers and bureaucrats).
Furthermore, children should be free to develop their
own culture, removed from the “oppressive parental guidance”.
Anticulturalist
educators preach that, rather than knowledge of any subject, children only need
the freedom to find out by themselves anything they want, without guidance.
Accordingly, no one needs to introduce them to quantum physics, thermodynamics or
existential epistemology.
The present result is that those who are raised with anticultural education, as above recommended, cannot even attempt to teach their
own children, because their education deprived them of the ability to return to
content-based education, or to teach teachers the subjects to teach.
Those who
don’t know history state self-assuredly that “ we don’t need history”.
Ignoring history is to culture the same as ignoring a person’s genes. The events
of history are like the genes of culture.
Anticultural specialists are