Kenosha Letters & others...

**********************************************************************************************************

Kenosha Letters -- Others

**********************************************************************************************

Kenosha Letters

Here are original records (some reconstructed from their censored or cut-to-size published form) of my letters published from 1996 to2001 in the "Kenosha News" newspaper (in Kenosha, Wisconsin), plus scattered unpublished commentaries and essays to be recovered and completed when (and if) I find the time. Some have been  (or will be) completed beyond the newspaper restrictions.

John J.P. Caporaso     
******************************************************************************
To go directly to one of the titles below (e.g. "Machiavelli matters"), click <EDIT>, then <FIND> and then copy or paste the title "Machiavelli matters" into the "FIND WHAT" slot of the "Find and Replace" dialog box. Then click the "FIND NEXT" button toward the lower right corner of the same dialog box once or until the "Machiavelli matters" essay appears on the screen.

  The art of demanding vs. the skill of producing -- Multiculturalism menaces to Balkanize USA” -- State of the Union missed four afflictions -- Man and woman are complementary -- Our children need information, not formation -- Family attacked from many sides
-- Machiavelli matters -- Clinton's ominous snafus -- To closet or not to closet -- Undaunted Black Pragmatism -- The "Di" syndrome -- Where reason is not enough -- The age of Mediocracy -- Religions seem unable to stop anarchy -- Small world, global trouble
--  It is cultures, not races -- Public and media immersed in rotting brew -- The leftists stew in their own juice  -- Sex makes the difference  -- About sophisticated primitivism --   The unnecessary confrontation --  When sin becomes a virtue  --   The Billary loose cannons on deck --  "Revolution" sought to trash U.S. culture -- Conservatism may help U.S. avoid crisis -- Popularity made to overrule the law -- Two party rule: the evil and the stupid -- Can our parties be re-educated? -- Clinton blunders in the Balkans -- The Clinton touch -- Clinton’s international slaughter -- Kosovo: a historical hoax --  U.S. medicine Trojan-horses socialized medicine --  "Abortion: Destroyer of peace" -- Education or bigotry -- Family is always central -- Yesterday’s fantasy is today’s reality --  What will the ‘100th monkey’ do? -- Historic events: the genes of culture -- Pandering to homosexuals -- “Not even gods can change history” -- De Sade’s Unheeded Metaphors -- The Ominous Verdict --  The equality fraud  -- Gore the savior  -- Hell's road paved with good intentions” -- Advance Good Riddance Obituary  -- Elections by Squabbles --  Postmodern Religion/Politics Intercourse  -- Race vultures exploit "black rage" -- Raise the age of majority to 23 or 25  -- Dumbing of America -- Alleged genetics -- "Sophisticated primitives" -- Creating www.higheryet.com -- The unnecessary confrontation. -- A peculiar interview
 

***************************************************************************************

Date published: 961211    The art of demanding vs. the skill of producing --

Here are some scrambled comments on a disturbing article of a few days ago favoring taxes and against “rich” people. The writer says that taxes are the expression of our regard for our community. In reality, they distance us from productive direct involvement.
The alienation of many tax beneficiaries, in fact, is in direct proportion to the aid they receive.
Our welfare spreads poverty because it teaches the poor the art of demanding rather than the skill of producing.
It is the welfare poor and the unemployable who move to high-tax states, with consequent development of endemic blight areas, disastrous finances and industrial survival exodus.
As a manufacturer, I prefer to move to a state where lower taxes allow me to invest more of my profits in equipment, production and jobs.
Such results are far more and better than any tax can produce.
At best, government “creates” more jobs for job’s sake, which produces nothing and bleeds the nation.
Even the idle rich can be more productive than that, because they only purchase what they can use, from people with the necessary skill and productivity. The latter profit and create new jobs.
The government can only lower those skills to the standards they can impose by legislating equality downwards.
The unions contribute by imposing promotion by seniority rather than by skill.
The union member complaining about being held down for that reason is no longer uncommon.
At a trade show, we were forced to hire a union member to merely watch us erect our exhibit (he did not have the skill for it). He could only watch us doing "his work".
“Sorry, -he said- this is how we make our living”.
In physics, “entropy” says that the universe tends toward chaos.
Leftist governments and unions are entropic.
Certainly, you have heard of the Soviet Union and Cernobyl. That’s is how the poor get poorer.
For thousands of years, poverty induced people to work and learn skills, not to “produce crime”.
So, the poor became rich, and the rich who didn’t measure up to what brought them there became poor.
Social mobility, it was called.
Now, the poor have more rights than duties; the “rich” almost only duties.
So, the rich are forced to learn and use more skills, and the poor are “protected” from the necessity of learning and using skills.
And the politically created economic gap worsens, especially in the present high-tech cybernetic age.
USA was the land of opportunity to success through free competition.
Wealth is the most impartial form of success available. Much more than class privilege or legislated leftist despotism.
Everyone is told he (or she, of course) has the right to become rich in free competition.
But the government expands the meaning of “rich” to virtually anyone who owns taxable (and mortgaged) property, to extract more taxes, as well as expands the definition “poverty level” to justify the taxes and create more “entitlement” voters.
As the “losers” (a term fomented by rabble-rousing politicians) are always more numerous, they prevail in implying an evil feeling in the political statement: “the rich guys won”.
Such a feeling has always been there, even in the times in which the tabloids glorified the “beautiful people”.
Capital gain tax? Many call it fraudulent extortion.
I bought land in 1972 for $16,000/acre, built a manufacturing plant on it, and created jobs.
Then, inflation came. The real estate taxes went up at the same rate, and I paid those increasing taxes for 23 years, year after year.
Then, in 1994, I needed more land for my business (I had committed the sin of succeeding in spite of the odds and taxes).
Prices for the same kind of land had reached around $160,000-200,000 per acre, and none was available next door. So, I had to sell and move.
The ensuing capital gain tax was nothing more than a tax on inflation from government overspending.
What gain, if I needed over 10 times as much money for the same land?
The added tax was a double taxation-extortion, after I had already repeatedly paid additional every year.
Hardly any tax could be more abusive.
Controls? Another “blessing”. The government forces a business to display notices in the most prominent places to warn employees against possible abuses by the employer.
Why not also notices about employees’ duties?
Because the legislators can get more votes from artificially alienated employees than from the employers?
It is odd that the government is relentless against successful business.
The employer who mistreats his employees is likely to fail, for he gets the cooperation he deserves.
Well: once a bloodless rock, he can be used as a tax-entitled “victim”.
And who pays?
Controls spawn like epidemics.
Think: a government agency commits suicide when it resolves the problem it was created for.
Its funding and jobs won’t be needed any longer, unless new trouble is found or created.
Thus, new laws and rules are issued that turn more screws on life and business; which justifies more “public service” jobs for more unneeded people, who cannot help becoming hostile from transforming honorable citizens into law-created criminals.
They say they do it to protect the public… I wish I had more room to describe it here.
War of classes? Classes are a social fiction some politicians need to homogenize people in socially engineered categories.
There are only individuals, and they cannot be obliterated in classes.

Psychologists who declared homosexuality “normal” did it in the same spirit as declaring diabetics normal as such. They are, but they fight diabetes. Impatient activists appropriated and politicized the issue.
Take premarital sex: we know that it is widely practiced, we hide or condemn the “sin”, but not the perpetrators, unless they display it or claim special privileges..
Lust gratification control with sin designation, and guilt feeling after sinning, kept Western morality standing. The theory of self-esteem necessity outlaws guilt, the self-control of the Christian ethics system.
Neutralize guilt feeling with unconditional self-esteem, and you cripple traditional morality. Someone declares that normal marriage and gay cohabitation are “different and equal”.
 Then, cohabiting homosexuals should label their arrangement or contract any way they want, rather than “marriage”.
When I wrote about it before, I titled my letter “To Closet or Not to Closet”, because the focus was Machiavellian rather than moral: gays should avoid a self-victimizing confrontation with those who resent the tampering with the most venerable heterosexual institution.

The instinctive heterosexual defensiveness against aggressive homosexual encroachment will never change. Primordial defensiveness reigns, and heterosexuals are by far the overwhelming majority.
The generalized image of homosexuality is like unmarried sex aggravated by the same-gender intercourse. Male/female fornication is statistically much more natural than homosexuality, but unmarried lovers would cause vehement opposition if they considered themselves victims of, and entitled to, anything unobtainable without marriage or conventional family.
 
It is not happening. Therefore we have no vigilantes horrified by fornication.
Some object that gays have taken over Hollywood. Only apparently.

Historically, gifted gays are relatively prominent in artistic and intellectual fields because oppression by conventional society often inspires artistic or other creative expression. It should have nothing to do with morality.

“Pursuit of happiness”? But happiness and pleasure are ultimately opposites.
Today’s “Gay Pride Parades”, like the ancient “Bacchanalia”, end in sadness with masked desperation.
Happiness necessitates lasting goals available to both heteros and homos on a loftier-than-crotch level, where pleasure is an interlude, not a goal.

Tchaikowsky was tormented by that dilemma and finally sublimed his repressed homosexuality into composing immortal music.
Lord Byron chose poetry and veiled his torment. Normal sexuality (not homosexuality) is genetic but doesn’t enslave us.

We can sublime it, because free will determines behavior.
Millions, not just virtuous monks and priests, do it for many causes.
Some homosexuals were great contributors to civilization who refused to exhibit and promote their peculiarity.
Gays who choose confrontation ruin their chances to survive in a world in which the survival of life is reproduction.
Finally, linking homosexuality to Paganism and heterosexuality to Christianity can degrade to a confrontation between witches and witch hunters.
Or should we dream of an evolutionary transformation modeled after the “impossible” dialog between Aristotle and Christ?.
Who blinks first?
JJP Caporaso

 970124  Multiculturalism menaces to Balkanize USA”

Some writers who cannot master our culture embrace “deconstructionism”, where reality is a social “construct” to be undone by arbitrary interpretation, so that opinion replaces truth.
They downgrade culture into race/gender, and postulate that: Cleopatra (69-30 B. C.) was black (she was from the white European Macedonian Tolomee family, which Alexander the Great installed to rule Egypt), Aristotle stole philosophy from the library of Alexandria (which was built several years after Aristotle's death in 322 b.c.), Egypt, science is a patriarchal fraud, God usurped Heaven from Goddess, and so on. Shakespeare cannot compete with Marxist, feminist, lesbian and gay writers in universities like Princeton, Columbia, Stanford.
Jesse Jackson heads 500 Stanford University students chanting: “He/he, ho/ho, Western Culture’s got to go..”. Yet people from all over the world come to America and Europe to absorb our culture.
Overnight anti-West “multicultural consultants” sprout, but Western Culture is so multicultural, that it does no longer consider foreign what it assimilated for millennia from other cultures. Nevertheless, “multiculturalists” (they also deconstruct) aim to balkanize our cultural complex into hostile fragmentations that destroyed past civilizations. They don’t see the irony of using Western languages and ideologies to fight the Western culture. Their enemy is history, not the West.
They slouch into one contraflop (=whatever ends up flopping toward the opposite of its goals) after another.
One is “ebonics”, an experiment to make black illiterate prattle into a language.
Another is the “Quanzaa”, black "African-American" alternative to Christmas.
Ebonics transforms childhood illiteracy into a lifetime handicap. The same kind of white kid illiteracy is just as sloppy as the black, but for centuries it has been simply corrected, not embalmed into a branding definition. Qwanzaa is even worse, because it starts pretending that African American heritage is Swahili, a Persian/Arabian-influenced Bantu language originated in a limited East-Africa coast area, whereas the original African Americans came from West Africa, where entirely different languages were spoken.
Then, the Qwanzaa “seven principles” ( Umoya, Kujichagulia, Ujima, Ujamaa, Nia, Kuumba, Imani, Swahili for: unity, self determination, collective work & responsibility, cooperative economics, purpose, creativity, faith) resemble a Mickey Mouse Maoism irrelevant to most African Americans for the past 31 years.
Apolitical Christmas appeals to all races and cultures, none excluded. It is unforgivable to widen the gap between races and cultures that need to harmonize. 
The monochrome “rainbow coalition” offered to the black Americans may be discounted as a forgettable contraflop, but trying to offer them culturally malignant solutions cannot pass unnoticed.

970215    State of the Union missed four afflictions

Your "State of the Union" of Feb. 1st missed 4 basic American afflictions: (1)race-, (2)gender- and (3)class-hatred, plus (4) unneeded laws.
RACE. Demagogues have fomented anti-white racial hatred, ostensibly because the first blacks came as slaves. But black slaves were captured by Africans who sold them to other Africans and Arabs for centuries, before selling them to the whites.
Black Africans still now capture, sell, torture, mutilate and massacre their own neighbors by the hundreds of thousands, and millions.
Slaves who were brought to the USA were comparatively “fortunate” and reached higher life standards than blacks anywhere else. Over 300,000 whites died to free them as full-fledged Americans, because being American is a cultural, not a racial matter. Therefore black Americans do not commit the atrocities now endemic in much of Africa.
Demagogues suborn them against the whites to obtain their compact votes, but they cannot stop the emergence of hundreds of great black Americans, from Thomas Sowell to Clarence Thomas, who can end the fabricated “African American” handicaps.
GENDER. Gender chauvinism becomes male-hating feminism, which is genetically suicidal, for 50% of woman’s genes are paternal.
This speaks unarguably for the family, which the gender feminists oppose, to confine man to sperm-donor functions.
So, the feminist egg donors end up with three feet in their mouth.
Class warfare of any kind has one race main victim: the individual. None of us can escape being an individual. Furthermore, classes like “workers” and “capitalists” can no more fight each other than blood and heart.
Do worker individuals who become capitalists (myriads do) automatically acquire the evil attributes they previously ascribed to the class of the rich?
Unneeded laws make crimes out of problems they are invoked to solve, and criminals out of honorable citizens who cannot conform.
So, the solutions are expected from legislators whose overriding interest is to get reelected on the promises of resolving presumably unresolved issues, with bureaucrats whose jobs depend on keeping the problems unresolved and contriving more parasitic rules “for our protection”.
I read that USA has 5% of the world population, but 80% of the world lawyers, and that Washington DC has more lawyers than all of Japan. If so, shouldn’t lawyers and bureaucrats legislate most of themselves out of existence?
 

 970318   Man and woman are complementary

In response to a letter criticizing my dislike for gender feminism, I wish I could compose madrigals to womanhood. The Crusaders learned them almost 900 years ago from Moslem troubadours who sang to the unreachable beauties that the rich requisitioned out of circulation.
Wrong scenario; yet it was uplifting for the same woman who was first blamed for mankind’s evils as the inquisitive Pandora, then as silly Eve, reputed to accept a rotten apple from a snake who couldn’t have sold a fur to a naked millionaire on an iceberg.
Countless men and women still believe it after about 3000 years.
Apparently, both fear the power and responsibility of woman’s existential advantage.
Even the “lowliest” unwed mother personifies the “mother Nature” metaphor after heterosexual conjunction. First on a primordial level, before reaching beyond procreation.
For this, human aspiration is a free posture, not nature’s mandate, for nature doesn’t care who survives.
A mother can naturally become a sophisticated nutritionist, nurse, teacher, educator, psychologist, and whatever her offspring needs. Or settle on a promising cow level.
A man can too, but he is no promising “father Nature”.
He must prove himself all his life relentlessly: hunt, compete, conquer, build, lead.
Typically, man builds pyramids and mousetraps.
Woman nurtures kings and commoners.
Therefore history is made by woman, but men make history.
A woman who disdains her natural power sinks into imitating (“competing”) man’s treadmill.
But man/woman are devotedly complementary, not “opposite” sexes.
Genuine feminism tried to re-route woman from Venus to Mars, not vice versa.
Gender feminism wants woman to “transcend” the family and compete with man in selling bonds or driving cement mixers.
It declares science a patriarchal fraud, and that all gender inclination differences are male-imposed.
It decrees family as woman’s slavery, lesbianism as liberation from heterosexual male oppression, western culture and white male (adding a smug racist incongruity) as misogynous strongholds…
Some call the gender feminists “feminazis”, and I quipped about them, while supporting the genuine feminism. Woman cannot be a gender feminist, but they make her believe she is, by a semantic deception.
Feminazis detest man, and want woman to thunder for their oxymoronic brand of “equality”.
I think woman would prefer the genetic differences, for they are coherent with the triumphant rites of life.

970415    Our children need information, not formation

About 2500 years ago, the Sophists emerged in Greece.
They were the first philosophers to teach for money and foster the craft of gain rather than knowledge, so that gain replaced truth and morality. Previously, teaching was obvious and unconditional, like parenting, and philosophy searched truth and morality.

Today’s anti-Western culture teachers resume both the venality and sophistry in an ominous way, politically organized with periodic pedagogic upgrades.
They are a crusading class forcing the parents to take position on the ramparts of political warfare, just like the races, man/ woman, employee/employer.
When anti-Western teachers state that they need better remuneration and working conditions to improve teaching, they degrade education into a consequence of their welfare, not vice versa.
They join the sophisticated primitives of anti-Western “deconstructionism”/ “multiculturalism”, who parade sophisticated articulations of their primitive misconceptions.

They cannot avoid the virulent modern version of sophistic philosophy, because they are trapped in the contradictions of ignoring and “deconstructing” a Western culture they cannot absorb.
As true believers in the new cult, they feel the missionary zeal to excommunicate those with a different perspective: especially the bewildered parents.

I could go on and on about the malignant cultural fads. But what about the serious business of learning? Children go to school to gain knowledge, but they get opinions instead.

Today’s deconstructionist/multicultural teaching is a FORMATION process. Teachers are instilled a politicized pedagogy designed to influence students with multiculturalist and relativistic fervor based on smug opinions devoid of knowledge.
Brainwashing and formation differ only in intensity.

An activist teacher vilifying parents who support a “parental rights amendment” and oppose condom distribution in schools is either brainwashed or raging that parental involvement can desecrate teacher’s catechism.

Our children need INFORMATION, NOT FORMATION, for knowledge is the result of information. We form opinions, not facts.
“Knowledge” from formation is an imposture.

To overcome a “Catch 22” situation, the countless genuine teachers who have been muzzled by the present “multi-…“, “post-…“, and “-ism…“ fads should be freed to disinfest the knowledge establishment.
Just as Socrates and Plato killed the sophist dragons for 2400 years of posterity.

970513     Family attacked from many sides

Remember the family?
Family is not just sexual gratification, for which dates and simple copulation would suffice, but the nucleus of life reproduction and nurture, both sublimed in love. Yet, family is now under attack by the government, lawyers, homosexuals, feminists, decostructionists and leftist liberals.

Government delivered the first blow by lowering the majority age from 21 to 18, removing erotic irresponsibility from parental control.
The devastating consequences show in our divorce rate.

Our increased longevity and educational requirements should have raised majority age to 23 or 25. Intrusive legislation added insult to the damage by giving bureaucrats arrogant power over the family.

“Aid To Dependent Children” and welfare penalized marriage and father’s involvement.

Lawyers nailed the family’s coffin with “No Fault Divorce”, which insinuated malignancy in every marital difficulty.

Politicized psychologists branded homosexuality with a “normality” label that redefined the normal people as “heterosexuals”.
This marginalized the normality of male/female interaction in the reproductive familial reality.

Recognizing homosexual marriage puts homosexuals on an unnecessary collision course with the heterosexuals.
Marriage is upgraded by the family, not by a meddlesome government.
Considering marriage an unconditional right facilitates a devious substitution of reproductive union with sterile eroticism, ruthless toward the children (which makes partial-birth abortion easier than abstinence) and a pandering for votes by irresponsible voters, whose number increases as bellicose “entitlements” are dispensed like “wheat and games to the populace” (a Freudian slip about politician’s contempt for the “populace”).

Gender feminists, ignorant of woman and history, see the family as patriarchal oppression and woman enslavement.

Deconstructionists, the Trojan horses of our culture, are dedicated to the deactivation of the family and Western culture, which they aim to fragment with a malignant “multiculturalism”.
They fear family as the nemesis of big government and multiculturalism.

Nuclear and extended families harmonize in commonly agreed values and form the basis of democratic societies from below.

Big government is imposed from above through proliferating regulations to support bureaucracies and politicized organizations.
They spawn victimization of workers, women, children, minorities and races, to fabricate a lynching mood against family, individual initiative, competition, unpoliticized education, values and secularized religion.
Does anyone care?

970604       Machiavelli matters.

Our political parties are sometime defined “the evil and the stupid”, because they push their wishes against the reality.

Leftist bureaucrats pervert statistical data, naturalize hordes of unqualified and dangerous immigrants, and disguise lies, all to create welfare-spawning votes.

Republicans, unable to relate to the public, rely on “experts” who cause incomprehensible election defeats.

Success favors those who cynically proclaim what the public wants to hear.
Democrats deliver the chicken-coop to the fox by granting billions to the squanderers of welfare and education, sacrificing the poor, old and children for votes.
Politicians abuse flattery to snare votes from people they shun. Virtue, love, rights and morality become slime balls paraded as sacred icons because we cannot break the vicious circles of misconceptions, deceptions and cover-ups.

Tribunals play an unrealistic game of win-and-lose, where winners, losers, and lawyers dispute “indisputable” evidence and use the judges and juries as game pieces .

Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527 a.d.) could have written the above.
About 500 years ago, since he faced overwhelming prejudices and holy cows, he used a tongue-in-cheek style, like: “Men ought not to do as they ought to do but ought to do as they do do”, roughly equivalent to “Pray to God and keep the powder dry”, but weeding out the metaphysical.
He proposed rules of conduct based on reality and results, rather than on ideals and faith.

We should build on what “is”, not on what “should be”, and then develop realistic “should be” from it.

Accordingly, personal interest is no longer just greed, the respectable banker is not a usurer, the entrepreneur is not an exploiter, sex is not lechery, passions are human nature. Their desirability is measured in terms of their results, not of our convictions.

Sociologists, historians and “Realpolitik” see Machiavelli as the herald of the one system that could finally evolve human behavior through reality. Yet, all we are told he stood for is “The goal justifies the means”, which is sanctimoniously implemented by our parties, unions, government agencies, businesses, politicized organizations and Billary.

Machiavelli never prescribed “evil” against “good”.

He exposed the problem only to expose a diagnose for a prognosis.
So should we.

970701     Clinton's ominous snafus

Clinton’s fingernails are scratching the chalkboard of history.
His first action in office was to order the military to admit the homosexuals unconditionally, which made a festering gash out of a sore.
Now, he wants the American whites to apologize to the blacks for past slavery. Against history and truth? How many American whites had slaves? What about asking African tribes to apologize for having captured and sold their neighbors to America centuries ago? Nonsense: either neighbors would have captured and sold the others if they had won the fights.
Clinton even proposes a year of racial “conversation”, with the whites in forced apologizing submission.
No, Billary, let’s converse in earnest, lest further falsifications of truth and history worsen the situation irreversibly. History shows: (1) Over 600,000 white Americans died for under 2,000,000 blacks (slaves and not) in the Civil War. That is, 1 white died for 3 black slaves (without counting the wounded and crippled). No one else, anywhere, anytime, sacrificed nearly as much for the blacks. (2) Black America is freer, healthier, more prosperous and civilized than any black (and often non-black) nation in the world. (3) Survival of black slaves brought to America was much higher than that of their captors in Africa. No one, anywhere, anytime, did nearly as much against the blacks as the African blacks. Therefore, informed blacks are thankful that their enslaved ancestors were brought to America rather than left in Africa, then liberated by the whites who even died for it, while slavery and gigantic holocausts were and are still persisting in Africa. (4) Thousands of black Americans owned slaves too.
Actually, American blacks and whites should celebrate their good luck. With that, political racial vampirism would starve to death. And so would the white-hating organizations, publications, media, politicians, educators and history fakers who thrive on unopposed anti-white and anti-America propaganda. Deserted by race pimps, cynical liberals and invertebrate conservatives, courageous blacks and whites will have to start constructive harmony together. And black /white Americans would finally evolve into their cultural brotherhood. But, please, let’s keep political histrionics and sanctimonious vultures out of it.

970805      To closet or not to closet

Meddling politics inject a cancerous growth into homosexuality.
First, homosexuals have no choice but active proselytizing, to obtain pro-gay laws, because they are less than 2%, not the advertised 10%, of our society.
Furthermore, since politically correct American psychologists have declared homosexuals normal, raising and converting children into homosexuality is an efficient expedient to promote the homosexual legal privileges.
The very fact that homosexuals frantically deny that they do it is quite a contorted Freudian slip.
Religion, anthropology and art suggest that the lure of sex is rooted in the darkness of forbidden mysteries, where myth and reality converge. Therefore, sanitized nakedness in nudism camps lacks the hidden pathos of sex taboos and induces erotic fantasies about dressed nudists.
Since sex is the origin of life, many consider any lovemaking without reproduction intent as an aggravated mutual masturbation. It can be branded as a defying debauchery, if openly unleashed.
Like any unreproductive sex, homosexuality has traditionally remained discreet to proceed undisturbed.
Legal protection of homosexuality as a civil right exacerbates a social conflict culminating in the gay marriage dispute.
Marriage, like sex, has one fundamental purpose: reproduction of the species.
Sexual pleasure was created by nature, not by man, merely as bait to reproduction. Gay marriages do not produce children any more than sex between same-gender fat or tall people, or between corkscrews. Therefore, a law granting the right of same-gender people to marry is grotesque. Moreover, children raised by gay parents flaunt deviation from the natural family. I doubt that the homosexuals wish to use gay marriage to advocate a barren society.
Gay geniuses and leaders avoided exposure by muffling their homosexuality, in order to work with undisturbed creativity; otherwise, we would have lost some immortal achievements we benefit from. The militancy of gay exhibitionists has no more right to favored political protection than that of astronomers or nurses of the same gender pursuing mutual erotic gratification.
Besides, who could stop the legislating government from regulating fellatio, cunnilingus, onanism, sodomy and bisexual fornication? Homosexuals and sex gourmets would seek refuge in new closets…
Question of morality? That and beyond, where congruity comes first. 

970905         Undaunted Black Pragmatism

I read an impressive editorial (probably 1000 words) by a brilliant black columnist on a wistful trip to her native home in S.Carolina, reminiscing that, 35 years ago, blacks could not sit in a local restaurant, were object to abuse, etc.
Next page, the newspaper had a timid 100-word mention of massacres in Africa by Hutus who burned tents with 8000 Tutsis inside and hacked hundreds of them to death, in northern Rwanda.
Days before, a dear friend told me that the blacks are still smarting from discrimination, therefore I shouldn’t write that they are better off in USA than anywhere else.
Perspective, please! Why musing about a fading past more than protesting that Tutsis, Hutus, Zulus, Somalis, Sudanese, Nigerians, Liberians, Rwandans, and many more African blacks are torturing, massacring, selling each other into slavery still now, and still continuing?
What would that talented columnist be doing if Rwandans, Hutus, Sudanese or other African blacks were running the USA?
Anyone can still affirm that the American blacks are better off in USA than anywhere else, even recognizing that there are still racial discrimination problems to resolve.
On the other hand, other injustices and abuses still suffered by all, including whites, were and are often worse than racial discrimination.
Yet, their victims produce far less votes than the victimized blacks. Therefore, we gloss over bigotry, atrocities and massacres in most nations and cultures. Denouncing or punishing them is futile, and can even exacerbate them. Continuous rehashing of past racial wrongs foments insatiable resentment on both sides. It contaminates the black-American posture with incurable hostility and fattens the race pimps. Politicians need victims to entice their votes. Only education and undaunted goodwill can provide the racial justice we need.
A black businessman friend of mine employs only whites, and he says: “Today most blacks are unreliable”.
I disagree, and he overstates: “The problem is not race, but using their troubles as excuses for irresponsibility. I want to make a good living; I have talent and no excuses. And that’s it.”.
This undaunted pragmatism could obviate black unemployment and disadvantages by impartially exposing some factors politicians consider unmentionable.

971003         The "Di" syndrome

 356 B.C., Herostratus a typically forgettable man, decided to acquire an absurd and logically immortal fame by burning down the temple of Artemis, in Ephesus, Greece, one of the Seven Wonders of the World.
He succeeded as the first of the famous nobodies. In 1981 A.D., Diana Spencer, 20, a stunningly photogenic beauty, married Prince Charles, to become the future queen of of the U. K., mother of a future king, and a mutated Herostratus.
As she didn’t fit Charles and the royal life style, she became the Windsor Dynasty translucent Trojan horse.
Charles returned to his long-time sweetheart and Diana upstaged him with multiple adulteries.
After the unavoidable divorce, instead of retiring into opulent privacy, like other billionaire spouses dedicated to showy good deeds without skills or sacrifices, she used royal and public money, plus the media and the paparazzi, to undermine the royal family.
She even stated publicly that Charles (father of her children) was “unfit to be a king”.
Aug. 31, 97, she died in a 120(!)-mph car crash in a tunnel in Paris, with an Arab playboy lover, a bodyguard and a drunken driver.
The ensuing explosion of hyperpopularity in her favor generated a tabloid revelry with mob schmaltz.
Her tragedy overshadowed her failure to burn the royal temple that nurtured her, created a new misdirected fame, and vindicated the Windsors by default.
In historical contrast, two authentic giants, Viktor Frankel, 92, and Mother Teresa, 87, died within 5 days after Diana.
Dr. Viktor Frankel, an Austrian Jewish genius who survived 3 Nazi Holocaust camps, created the logotherapy, an existentialist psychological methodology that used a logic search for meaning as a therapeutic tool: a revolutionary advance from stagnating post-Freudian psychoanalysis, to resolve countless emotional and intellectual problems. Mother Teresa, the towering saint who formulated and mastered her life’s meaning, epitomized holy life itself. . There is no description good enough to depict her in this short letter.
As an oxymoronic twist, someone compared Mother Teresa with princess Diana; like comparing a mighty river with a pretty bubble…
As to dr. Frankel, his meaning is far beyond the mental range of mobs, tabloids and paparazzi.

971107         Where reason is not enough

Both Nietzsche (with misgivings) and Marx (with relish) proclaimed that God was dead.
Too many politically correct clergy secretly agree and double-preach.
Since we cannot eliminate God without putting something in His place, we install a deconstructed Morality cult, like that of the Goddess Reason in the French Revolution. But this Morality cult is doomed like Goddess Reason’s because it has no priests and proven sacred absolutes.
Despite their claims, most people prefer believing against thinking.
The smug dismissal: “You are entitled to your opinion” is the taste-equalizing ketchup on right and wrong, which renders opinion and truth equally irrelevant.
About 2500 years ago, Buddha created a metaphysical-mental process in India, and Confucius a normative familial-social system in China.
Both mentioned no god or afterlife, had behavioral rules, and were attractive substitutes for religion. But mankind was not ready for sophisticated wisdom, and changed them into the religions we know today.
In America, we go from religion to an anti-Western nihilistic “deconstructionism” that approaches the Orwellian “Love is hatred”, “Truth is falsehood” implicit in “Everyone is entitled to any opinion”.
Traditional religion preaches DUTIES, whereas today‘s “REASON” offers popular “RIGHTS.
Duties require discipline and facilitate cooperation; rights attract votes and foment conflicts.
We have the vicious political, racial, gender, cultural and other conflicts.
“Anti-hate” laws promote hatred toward politically incorrect citizens.
Gandhi preached “Eye for an eye makes the world blind”, and today’s persistence of eye-for-an-eye atrocities reconfirms his wisdom.
Unionized workers call their employers operation infamous and demand compensation for their years of “devotion” (to infamy?) to the employer.
Condoms and chastity sermons are simultaneously delivered to school children.
We may tell diabetics to avoid sugar but are forbidden to advise homosexuals to avoid AIDS-infested sodomy, or to call it unnatural.
American industry is depicted as a malefic polluter and workers-exploiter, while it produces the world’s best sanitation, medicines, food, jobs, progress and prosperity.
Christians, Moslems and others have behaved no better than most atheists, but they still had undisputed rules which, if followed, would have resolved many problems.
Our present “postmodern” society disputes those rules and the Ten Commandments as mere patriarchal impositions. Ask any gender feminist.

 

971220         The age of Mediocracy

Our voting system favors the misinformed and incompetent. They elect mediocrities like Clinton, who focus on political correctness, vote-pandering, septic political contributions, sex harassment, homosexuality, abortion and “racial justice”.
What can Bill/Hillary do after failing to resolve the Bosnian and Midlle-East impasses, the tax, healthcare and racial mess?
Take credit for the Republican-protected economy? History disagrees.
Jump on the Green-House-Effect wagon? But is there a greenhouse effect?.. Another flop…
Then comes the media poison pill: a black man in shackles on Newsweek’s front page: “Should America Apologize?” (What “America”?).
Clinton jumps centerstage, to make history, and publicly praises a white teenager’s embarassment in front of an indigent black. It’s slavery, man! Hate the whites! Applause.
Aren’t 600,000 white Civil-War dead enough? How many whites owned blacks? 1 or 2%?
Over 1000 blacks owned black slaves In New Orleans alone.
A college professor tries to explain his findings that lower intellectual interest among blacks and Latinos is aggravated by focusing on blaming the whites rather than on self-improvement.
Suddenly, eagerly, all the national race pimps scurry to the TV screens and thunderously demand the professor’s social and professional execution. But KKK and Nazi parades are still allowed and police-protected.
What if the race-pimps run out of excuses, and the blacks have to face each-other and admit that they are like everybody else?
We all (white, black and in-between) had enslaved ancestors.
Then, there is sex. Straight, homo, abused, porno, and the gender feminists demand for the politically correct petting only after the proper male petition for the legally expressed female permission for every creeping step of his hand under her underwear.
Armies of sex-frustrated prigs mushroom out of nowhere and set up hate-the-man clinics and sex-abuse witch-hunts, spiced with “suppressed-memory” recalls.
Thousands of hapless adults and children are emotionally and socially crippled for life by the sex-witch-hunters.
The prigs legislate against “hate crimes”, but the hate they spawn is much more diffused and vicious than the alleged “abuse”, “greed” or “bigotry”.
They think that their own perversion is an ordained virtue, because it is politically correct. .
Just like those who chose Barabbas.

980104      Religions seem unable to stop anarchy

I read the Protestant message “Peace on Earth, and good will toward man” in a Catholic church. The Catholic message is: “Peace on Earth to the men of good will”, which stresses the basic requirement of good deeds beside faith. The priest I asked about it said that the matter was “unimportant”. Wrong: it is theologically fundamental. Rationalizing everything is the AIDS of Christianity, Judaism, Islam and any revealed religion.
Without doctrinal absolutes, each of those religions seems unable to stop the anarchy within.
The more “progressive” or “with the times” a church becomes, the more clergy become like doctors who join the insanity of the asylum inmates.
To wit: the gay ministers in gay communities.
God has been democratized. He’d better like it, or they’ll elect another god, as they do with ministers who don’t please their parishioners. Therefore new sects mushroom every day everywhere, to sanctify whatever the marginal deviants want to hear.
A prestigious physician unexpectedly discontinued her famous lectures and joined a “mutual-masturbation church”. Probably we will see her preaching against masturphobia, a newfound hatecrime.
Perspective? In the 1618-1648 European “Thirty-Year War”, both politicized Catholics and Protestants committed wholesale rape, torture and even cannibalism against each other, and massacred one third of Europe, in the name of God.
Embarrassing to remember.
Thus, history shows that religion cannot accept politicized equality, rights without duties, and the consequent “everything goes”.
Add the anti-Western multiculturalism, and we have a recipe of Dr. Jekyll’s potion.
Role models? “Mother Teresa is too remote" –said the lady on the radio- "I look up to princess Diana: with her defects and adulteries, she is like most of us…”. Neurotic bimbos rather than heroes and saints?
200 years ago, GWF Hegel, the fountainhead of modern thinking, stated that there are 2 kinds of men: the free, willing to die for their beliefs, and the slaves, who compromise anything to survive. It boils down to the rare virtuous ones versus the crowds of evil and invertebrates among us.
How do we recognize the free man? But then, would slaves elect him or another Billary for leadership?

980203         Small world, global trouble

When I returned from Paris last November, I wanted to relate 2 shocking experiences: the reaction to a book and the strike by 225,000 French truckers who deliberately blocked international transportations, causing surprising multinational damages, countless hospital and plant shutdowns, and even murders.
Concomitant with the strike was the celebration of the 80th Nov. 7th anniversary of the Soviet Revolution, and the publication of the 830-page “Le Livre noir du communisme” (“Communism’s Black Book”), by reputable scholars documenting how leftist politics concealed international communism massacres of 85 to over 100 (perhaps 120) million dissidents.
The strike was loudly publicized by the shocked international reaction.
The book got some mentions, but I was unable to find or order it in any Paris bookstore.
This was ominous in 1997-8 Europe, where only Germany and Spain have non-leftist governments.
Back in the USA, I tried to publish about the above experience, but I was told that that was for syndicated columnists. I again tried to buy the book, but no one seemed to know about it.
The only mention I found in the press was Jan. 16, in the Wall Street Journal, by Anne Applebaum, columnist of London’s Sunday Telegraph.
Here are two unspeakable horrors:
First, the revelation of the worst carnage by far in human history.
Second, the fact that such a revelation is ignored or glossed over is too appalling to believe.
A socialist bigot rationalized: “We erect altars to idols like “Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité”, or Socialism. Then, we start digging the foundations of socialism through the bodies of the blamed and executed dissidents. Mankind’s salvation is worth the death of human trash”.
A Parisian leftist bureaucrat became cynically hostile when I asked why he was disturbed by the “bourgeois greed” and not by the communist massacres. “That is class war –he added- and war has fatalities”.
That proved my point.
In Europe, they have destroyed the asylum but preserved the lunacy.
Is our public indifference to politicized immorality metastasizing into apathy about the worst massacres in history? Who can shift the American focus from Clintonian crotch operettas to such an unimaginable tragedy?   

980212      It is cultures, not races

A way to worsen the racial problem is to start a “Racial Dialog”. Races cannot dialog any more than livers or pituitary glands.
Only individuals can “dialog” about convictions and ideas, regardless of their race, gender, status and nationality. A white and a black, both devoted to Communism, Capitalism, Catholicism, Islam or microbiology have much more in common than two blacks (or two whites), who diverge in differing ideas.
Some people obsessed with race resemble vociferous zombies who see and hear no reality.
Understanding racial differences as morphologic rather than cultural is the key to solving our racial conflicts.
Racial pimps and Kukluxklanners refuse the historical evidence that intraracial (inside of a race) conflicts can be much more serious and frequent than between races.
Conflicts within Hutus/Tutsis or other African blacks, between religions, parties and nations anywhere on earth are incredibly worse than between whites and blacks.
The ancestral tribes of the American black slaves used to kill or sell into slavery a much higher percentage of their co-racial neighbors than whites versus “coloreds” anywhere..
Gullible whites seem to crave the surrealistic guilt of owning slaves centuries ago (maximum 1 or 2% of the white owned them).
Besides, how many black Americans would be alive or exist at all today, had not their enslaved forefathers been brought to America?. Those who could not be sold were too often killed or eaten by the captors.
Furthermore, the slaves would have become the captors and slave traders if they had won the same tribal wars that enslaved them.
Even without 600,000 white dead in the Civil War, no one else in the world did so much as the Americans to eliminate slavery (against the opposition of the African slave-traders). Yet, we remained with racial prejudices because too many whites and blacks are unable to distinguish between racial and cultural differences.
We can change cultures, not races. Statements about irreconcilable differences hide the fear that cultural harmony will put race pimps and vultures out of business.
Expecting the originally (West-African) American blacks to switch to distorted East-African (Swahili) “heritages” is anti-American-black, because it falsifies and handicaps them out of the American mainstream.
In successful countries, children of any ethnic origin are educated into the prevailing language and customs, in order to function and succeed.
Expecting the blacks to adopt primitive “ebonics” language and California-made “Quanzaa” ignores that sophisticated English and Christmas belong more naturally to the born American blacks than to most immigrants who came after them.
Americans who defiantly coagulate and practice African or other non-American ethnic characteristics to affirm their identity versus white Americans act like blind boisterous zombies programmed to self-destruct. Millions of blacks and whites finally understand it.
There is also the problem of “rights” as a bait.. Rights attract votes but foment hostility when they are without duties.
Duties –with or without rights- promote harmony, but require effort and responsibility.
Blacks have been conned with mirages of unconditional rights by white and black political vultures who even assert that duties for the blacks are exploitation by the whites.
This takes from the blacks the incentive toward acquiring skills and forces the whites to increase their own.
Nothing could widen the gap more between white and black, rich and poor.
Education could obviate the racial problems. It would show that races and their differences remain immutable regardless of understanding or prejudices. It is culture that creates prejudices, advantages and drawbacks. Demagogues tell the blacks “education is a white thing” to keep racial tensions chaotic.
Education would show that the American blacks, as a group, would already be one of the richest nations on earth. Education also shows that Egypt, Mesopotamia and India (preceded by the Sumerians) were neither black nor our primary roots.
That fiction was created by the race pimps to generate a false-pride trap to distract the blacks from an autonomous educational process, which would free them from their exploiters.
On the other hand, what would Mesopotamians (today’s Iraqis) have to do with the black Americans whose ancestors were raised and enslaved in West Africa? No more than the Russians with the Zulus.
Yet, a Russian raised in Zululand is enormously more different from a Russian raised in Russia than a Zulu raised in Russia.
Difficult to understand?

980310           Public and media immersed in rotting brew 

The brew is rotting and simmering, impenetrable, dark. Much of the public and media are immersed in it and ostensibly comfortable.
Occasionally, a slimy, putrid bubble emerges and pops Rodney King’s riots, Diana’s Paparazzism, Bill’s debauchery.
Some public voices proclaim the cliché ”My mind is made up, don’t confuse me with facts”, or they must recognize that what they want to condone is unforgivable. Oddly, the bubbly brew connotes Goethe’s drama of Dr. Faust contracting his soul to Satan to obtain power, youth and the lovely Gretchen.
Yet, Faust was a scholarly sage, not the lowbrow public/media brew. We have many Faust personifications: the politicized crowds slobber over obviously criminal gorillas, promiscuous bimbos and pornogoatish presidents as expedients to hit targets, further goals and pursue ideologies they cannot confess openly.
Political vultures and their followers fall into defending a doped black criminal and murderous riots to flash their racial pietism.
Schmaltzy mobs slide into idolizing a photogenic adulteress to cover the guilt of their lost virtues. Hillary is trapped in her Faustian connivance with Bill’s adulteries, because she needs him to preserve her power leftovers and her questionable place in history.
Meanwhile, Bill’s satyrism fills the chronicles. No alternatives: the contract is irrevocable. Virtue, fidelity, duties, merit-connected results, and man/woman/family devotion are no longer there to go back to. They deliver our nation to the demagogues, welfare usurers, vampiristic bureaucrats, and political maggots.
Will the Billary carcinoma metastasize? Race and gender exploiters, fawning parasites, political prostitutes sing the narcotic “who cares” mantra so that Billary can work on their schemes… Bill’s popularity means votes, power, even at the cost of the souls they have long lost…
Do we really think that the sinners of Sodom and Gomorrah thought: “I want to be depraved, evil”? I bet they said: “I am God’s creature. Therefore, God is with me”.
They united like corrupted workers or professionals to monopolize their interests and those of their virtuous counterparts.
The latter have the Faustian dilemma of exposing the evil and confronting its reaction. Redemption comes from rising against the evil.
It’s risky, but integrity can win against skullduggery.

980406         The leftists stew in their own juice 

In about the year 1800, Hegel, the most influential modern philosopher, thought the French Revolution was the “end of history”, that is, the ultimate synthesis of social development for all time. But it degenerated into despotic terror. Now, we think Democracy is the ultimate.
But Democracy is being perverted by leftist government contamination. After the USSR collapse, the government centralization rationale had to switch to the anti-Western, anti-family, feminist and perverted mantras, with intrusive controls and predatory bureaucracies.
So, will democracy also fail? Not, if we let the leftists stew in their own juice, like the Soviets.
First, the welfare state is being crushed by its own weight.
Gender-feminism’s belligerence ("feminazism") is sinking through the defensive phase. Our cynically fornicating president is being defended by Anita Hill, who tried to destroy a Supreme Court judge because of his joke about pubic hair on a bottle, and by Gloria Steinem, who sees Clinton as a “victim” of sex addiction, not as perpetrator of malignant debauchery.
Liberal legislators act like philanthropists who practice brain surgery without knowing anatomy.
Conservatives are unable to show that they oppose brain butchery rather than brain surgery.
The concurrence of disguised socialism and deconstructionist culture favors an octopus-government against democracy.
Liberal “democracy” demonizes productive citizens and multiplies the majority of failures and help addicts in favor of more government control, which penalizes competition, evolution and initiative. In other words, it chains freedom in favor of an imposed equality. This recalls the conservative version of Rousseau’s: “Man was born free but everywhere he is in chains”, whereas the American liberal version unleashed the lethal incest of freedom with enforced equality of results.
In that, Clinton has the satanic ability of attracting those he exploits, of making deception look like help, and cynicism like compassion.
How many people do we know like Clinton, with so many friends and associates convicted, jailed, contaminated, destroyed by defamation, suicide, “accidents”, permanently crippled in so many ways? His tacky fornication is only one facet of his diabolic allure. Surrealistically, his popularity spreads like an unstoppable plague.
Could his Gomorrah become the end of history?

980505 \        Sex makes the difference    

Our man/woman rules are based on assumptions as wishful as bi-directional gravity.
Sex makes the life-and-death difference.
A one-minute copulation can involve woman for over 20 years with child, without man even remembering it. Reproduction needs man’s craving and potency, regardless of woman’s desire or even awareness.
Man has to prove himself and perform all his life.
Woman is the existential metaphor: all she needs is to exist, for she is born virtually complete, finished, and yet free to develop further.
She is Mother Nature, and invariably symbiotic with her children.
Man’s appears superior: one man can produce even more than one thousand children.
One superwoman cannot produce more than about 30-40 children, no matter with how many men.
But woman’s advantage is precisely that all she needs is one child to be Mother Nature.
There is no Father Nature.
Since woman’s superiority recognition could alienate and neuter man, she nurtures his conditional and useful superiority.
Therefore matriarchy was always a welcome failure and patriarchy a convenient success.
Ours is a temporary period in history in which both woman and man sacrifice woman/man symbiosis on the altar of an “equality” that only produces hostile “woman rights” and man’s desertion.
The eternal “I am yours and you are mine”, where poetry and reality fuse, becomes a bureaucratized psychological taboo.
“No-fault divorce” destroys 90 families for the ten it amputates, deprives children of a potential parental attitude and sacrifices traditional manhood Man’s sacrificial superiority is not new.
Some Calicut (Malabar in India) tribe used to anoint a man as king and to slaughter him after 12 years. He was superior, as king. All obeyed his whims. But he was sacrificed to the survival of his slaves.
Christianity was called “slaves’ religion”, because the slaves were the last, but ultimately the first.
We affirm, with condescension, that insects will inherit the Earth. We imply some dark humor in it, but beetles are already well underway…
Probably outerspace beetles have already invaded Earth, and we don’t know… And we still think man is the king of the universe.
Is a sadistic god(dess) playing with us?

J

980603     About sophisticated primitivism

This newspaper allows monthly letters of maximum 350 words about “general” matters, while it invites 13 columnists to write weekly 750-word each about “local” matters like potholes and PTA.
I’ll try to describe within 350 words how we are being infused intellectual privitivism, relativism, gayola, etc. It’s both general and local, like most important matters.
Our everyday life is being infused with “deconstructionism”, which sees truth and morality as false social “constructs”, and replaces traditional values with personal interpretations. So, even hippies can become tenured university professors who jumble race, gender, politics and homofornication in “postmodern” culture.
Primitive whites resent a Western culture they cannot understand, and politicized blacks are being prompted that their race doesn’t belong.
Gender feminists proclaim that science and family are patriarchal frauds.
Instant-intellectuals contrive sophisticated articulations of the primitive notion that Western culture must be replaced with Balkanizing “multiculturalism” and moral relativism, which affect our children.
Ironically, those concepts were developed and exhaustively analyzed by the Western culture they accuse.
“Right” and “wrong” are first scrambled, then homogenized into a “collectively shared responsibility”, which obstructs the hometown police against crime and the U.N against genocide in Rwanda and against the documented massacres of over a hundred millions nonconformists by communists since 1917.
The communist culprits avoid prosecution because Marxism contaminates the decostructionist and anti-Western “intellectuals”.
Where will “social-justice” liquidate the next dissidents?
History condemns the leftists, and they drown history in “social studies” in our local schools.
“Postmodernism” prescribes the interpretation of (homo)sexual and political “meaning” of art works, purging them of aesthetic value and author’s mind.
5 volumes of the 60 titles of the “Oxford History of Art” have been published to describe art only in sexual/political/Marxist terms. How many artists would want anyone to focus on their sexuality instead of the aesthetic value of their masterpieces?
The tenured postmodern professors keep communicating with each other away from comprehensible public exposure, and we end up with the demented Unabomber facing the Inquisitor who hides behind a defensively impenetrable “intellectualism”.
Could these 350 words help the timid and deceived majority out of the quicksands?

*********************************************************************************************************
 

*******************************************************************************************************************

980701     The unnecessary confrontation   

 A letter (April 23) to Kenosha News misquoted the Bible: “...Just to love a (male) God with all your heart. (Isn’t that a form of homosexuality?)”.
Fellatio/sodomy with Whom?
No reaction was published. But the press reacts to Clinton’s appointment of an openly gay ambassador to Luxembourg.
Could the American Psychological Association come up with another politicized legerdemain to validate the fabricated claim that homo-sympathizers are the majority?
Militant homosexuals also try to homo-mutate family, education, God, Bible and most typically Judeo-Christian values.
Nature implants the sexual drive in us only as an inducement toward reproduction. Then, reproduction ascends to higher goals.
Homosexual gratification as a characterizing aspiration is a non-reproductive impasse.
Aggressive homosexual militancy alienates itself in a closed political circle.
Western morality controls self-centered lust gratification (homo and hetero) with the sin designation, and with guilt feeling after sinning.
Neutralizing guilt with “self-esteem” cripples morality. Hitler, Stalin etc. had abundant self-esteem.
Militant homosexuals are not happier than orgiastic heterosexual deviants.
A family based on homosexuality is an oxymoron. ****
Gays who want natural children need artificial heterosexual copulation. What better self-indictment?
Calling gay cohabitation “marriage” is like claim jumping on the most venerable heterosexual institution, and it looks like a masochistic extrapolation.
Therefore, like any non-reproductive sexual activity, homosexuality belongs in the closet.
Heterophobia is much more vicious than homophobia.
Moreover, heterosexuals are at least 98% of society. Zoologist Kinsey’s 10% homosexual figure came from a pool that included psychopaths, criminals and “temporary homosexuals”.
“Pursuit of happiness”? Happiness and pleasure are the ultimate opposites. “Gay Pride Parades”, worse than the ancient “Bacchanalia”, end in hypercrowded emptiness.
Both heterosexuality and homosexuality need discretion and restraint.
Happiness necessitates self-renewing "higher yet" goals on a loftier-than-crotch level, whereas pleasure is just an interlude.
Sexuality is genetic but not enslaving. We can sublime it, because free will determines behavior. Millions do it. Tchaikowsky (1849-1893) sublimed his repressed deviation into composing immortal music. Lord Byron chose poetry and veiled his homosexuality.
Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519), probably the greatest genius in human history, was claimed to be a homosexual. His mysteriously smiling Mona Lisa painting (which he presumably kept with him until he died) is suspected to reveal what only a few may be allowed to know beyond both homosexuality and heterosexuality...
Rather than blame homosexuals, I object to one-dimensional hetero and homo militants who handle pleasure as the ultimate goal, especially when they requisition even God for their unnecessarily inflammatory crusades.    

 980805     When sin becomes a virtue    

Sin is Virtue. Ignorance is Wisdom.
When you lose a politically correct argument, just call your opponent names. A police is doomed if he reacts in kind to an attacking criminal, but anyone may chant “kill the cops”. Sin is becoming virtue, ignorance and perversion are merit badges. “I cannot identify with Mother Teresa –says a woman on the radio- but I do with Princess Diana: she is an adulteress, like us all…”
The narcissistic cult of our popular “equals” as “role models” invites us to worship into our mirror. No more looking up. Rot where you are.
There is a strong campaign to eliminate grades in tests and make all contestants winners in sports.
The family is being legislated into an amoral democracy. Children may divorce their parents.
It is easier to marry and divorce than to get a driver license.
Western culture is the highest expression of human achievement in history, but the primitive culturally inerts oppose it in favor of “multiculturalism”, without understanding that Western culture is the epitome of multiculturalism itself. Deviant and immoral behavior patterns are declared “normal” by second-rate organizations and political groupies.
Ignorant and selective haters will be unionized as soon as they find a politically correct designation.
Race hatred is carefully maintained virulent to avoid the solutions that would remove the racial disadvantages and the race pimps. It is welded with chronic poverty, to sustain the coalition with the poverty vultures.
Self-important political hopefuls seek popularized martyrdom with carefully faked tortures, fasts, and similar tricks. Leftists spread stupid notions that all “rich” abuse the “poor”, without understanding that all “rich” know they cannot survive without opening social-economic mobility to the poor.
That is why the communist nightmare was consummated by its own ideology.
Ultra feminists proclaim that family and children are woman’s slavery to man. But no woman owes less of her total essence to her father than to her mother.
Would abortion advocates prefer to have been aborted?
What about consummating it retroactively?
Of course, while I cowardly publish my full name, noble knights perform the heroic deeds of calling me names from the shiny armor of their courageous anonymity.

980917         The Billary loose cannons on deck

Apparently to divert attention from his broom closet herotics, Clinton falls back on his mass-demagoguery, but displays obtuse cynicism about integrity, honor, responsibility and worldwide obligations.
The retaliation the anti-American terrorists deserve should avoid the trap they hope we fall into. Yet, Clinton swallowed the bait, instead of preparing his retaliation with the necessary diplomatic/military/strategic sophistication beyond the present tit-for-tat operettas. He has begun a potentially unstoppable worldwide nightmare that his cheerleader Albright calls “the war of the future”: the only possible “two-way” unilateral war (I thought it was an oxymoron) in which the terrorists get the sizzling steak while we obtain only shriveled potatoes.
Hundreds of millions of Arabs, Iraqis, Syrians, Iranians, Indonesians, Africans, Turkish/Moslems spread from Turkey to most of Southern Siberia and Asia, and many others live scattered in mountainous, impervious areas with less than one-person-per-mile population.
With just a primitive nuclear, biological or whatever bomb in the New York, Chicago or Los Angeles area, they can cause havoc beyond imagination. We must deploy enormously larger expenses, manpower and super-sophisticated weapons on virtually deserted territories to obtain almost insignificant results.
On August 21, Clinton did the equivalent of killing two lice with two bazookas despite his theatrical efforts to impress the world. He wrapped himself in his recycled patriotism and reaped international sarcasm. While the public focus is on his fornications, the prosecutors are legally required to report on Whitewater, Travelgate, Filegate, Rose Law Firm records, Hubbell, etc.
Furthermore, the stage is crowded with the rattling skeletons of the Foster “suicide”, criminally removed documents, papers shell-games, Hillary’s “miracle” of "investing" $1 for a $100 thousand profit, Tyson Foods, Lippo Group, Chinagate, Teamstersgate, and an incredible number of victims Clinton discarded like cigarette butts.
Would you buy a used truck from Bill or leave your daughter alone with him? Nevertheless, he is “popular”, according to unbelievable polls.
Should a special prosecutor check the authenticity or contrived predictability of those polls and expose the fraudulent communications by Clinton groupies to the public?
What if all the above is on the tip of the iceberg of the leftist contamination of America?

981017     "Revolution" sought to trash U.S. culture

Clinton’s followers are seduced by the “revolution” of the 60s, when America tried to jettison its cultural heritage. That cultural watershed glitched into “deconstructionist” and neomarxistic primitivism bent on trashing 3000 years of Western history. However, while other cultures like the Egyptian or Chinese experienced millennia of stagnation, Western civilization was always vibrant and creative, even in the” ‘Dark Ages”, and included the Mediterranean countries, Europe, the American continent, comprising numerous ethnic groups and languages.
The diverse range of Western achievements is so powerful that only a lifetime of studies can comprehend it adequately. The hippies, Marxists, gender feminists, and other anti-American activists themselves don’t realize that they use Western philosophy to attack their own culture, like a dog chasing his own tail.
Over 2000 years of Western thinking were planted in Greek and Latin literature, which began most of our cultural progress. Therefore these two languages were the foundation of our classic education. Our Founding Fathers were raised with such curriculum and predicated it for the following generations.
Today’s “Clinton talk” and immorality were taught by the Sophists 2500 years ago, and soon vivisectioned and embalmed by Socrates and disciples with a finesse never surpassed thereafter. Average kids used to translate such writings from ancient Greek and Latin in 10th grade.
Citizens so educated are not fooled by a Clinton who bewitches politically naive voters with gilded flimflam. Even our Asia-originated Judeo/Christian religions drank from the Greco-Roman well.
Thomas Aquinas used Aristotle teachings to develop the greatest theological treatise ever.
Plato’s “Republic” is still unsurpassed, and so many other ancient writings.
Surprisingly and unknown to most, USA is now becoming the center of Western culture revival, from history research to the Chicago Symphony, more so than Europe. Yet, “sex education”, narcissistic “self esteem”, charismatic snake-oil politicians, focus on school politics and salaries rather than curricula; drug/race/gender cultural cesspools and political prostitution submerge the needs of our children and families, where our future originates. Someone said that thinking itself originates from failure.
It reminds me of Rome and Italy, who endured countless ordeals to overcome the rotten politics that wrecked ancient Greece. 

981110     Conservatism may help U.S. avoid crisis

It takes more than crowing to make the sun rise.
A catastrophic worldwide financial storm is devastating one country after another from Asia and South America and is spreading toward Europe and USA.
It started unheeded, emerged first in July-November 1997 in currency, banking and industrial calamities in countries like Thailand and South Korea, then 1998 in Malaysia, Indonesia (May), Russia (August), Brazil and China (October) and many areas in-between, let alone Japan.
So far, the total involves disastrous inflations, national bankruptcies, crippling unemployment, misplaced capital depletions, and resulting poverty of such gravity that 40% of the world population has plunged into an unprecedented depression.
All measures to help, including huge wishful capital injections from sources like the USA, UNO, or IMF (in socialist or liberal styles) have only deepened the problems.

Now the fear is creeping in that America will ultimately be affected by this devastation. Notwithstanding other evidence, one common factor in the above-mentioned failures is that the economic activities of the countries involved were nationalized, government controlled or state-supported to varying extents.
The best-known case is the huge Japanese economy, where the government intrusion with industry and banking were endemic.
Another common characteristic is the widespread and heavy corruption of politicians and bureaucrats. None of those countries had a true capitalistic/ democratic system with the freedom of initiative and expression as exist in the USA. All shared intrusive government controls and self-perpetuating bureaucracies that socialists and liberals have in common.
Even a superficial analysis shows that America is surviving primarily because of its basic opposition to bureaucratized economy and government ”help”. In fact, America has so far avoided the global crisis because its conservative leaders have defeated almost all the wishful government interventions Mr. and Mrs. Clinton have desperately tried to push through, from socialized medicine to the spawning of government “helps” that would only benefit the politicians, controlling bureaucrats and politicized organizations.
Governmental blunders, corruption and incompetent interventions that economists don’t know how to correct caused the global financial crisis.
The merit Clinton and the leftist liberals claim for the present American prosperity is as valid as the rooster’s belief that his dawn-crow made the sun rise.

981204         A true believer nightmare

The 35-acre trapezoidal Jerusalem's Temple Mount is the most precarious piece of land on Earth.
It is the Al Aqsa Mosque and Dome of the Rock, Islam's holiest site after Mecca and Medina.
It is also the place of the demolished Herod's Temple, which the Jews are determined to rebuild, according to their prayer: "May it be Thy will that the Temple be speedily rebuilt in our days..."
For literal-minded Protestants, the reconstruction of the Temple is a precondition for Jesus' Second Coming... Against the Jewish "irrevocable" decision, the Muslims "will defend the Islamic holy places to the last drop of their blood"...
The Jews, on the other hand, prudently allow the Muslims to administer the site and permit no Jew or Christian prayer or other religious tasks on the disputed ground. The Israeli Chief Rabbis prohibit Jews to enter the place, which was only entered by the highest priest once a year.
Medieval sage Rashi asserted that the Temple could only come directly from heaven, together with the Messiah. Israel's Ministry of Religious Affairs sponsored all activities to study, plan and prepare the reconstruction of the Temple, thus provoking the Muslim fury.
Numerous Jewish Talmudic students are (1989) studying details of Temple service, and determining who will conduct services in the Temple... Over 100 ritual objects, including trumpets, lyres and lots, vestments "from flax spun by hand into sixty-stranded threads" are being zealously prepared.
Priests will "purify their bodies with the cremated ashes of an unblemished heifer before they enter the Temple". Members of the Temple Institute are scouting Europe for "heifer embryos that will be shortly implanted into cows at an Israeli cattle ranch"...
Money for these projects will only come from Jews. Any other money will be rejected...
Historian David Solomon states: "Every day's delay is a stain on the Nation"...
One common god is worshipped by three monoteistic religions consumed by mutual hateful intollerance.
They didn’t even learn the peaceful coexistence propensity of many pagan religions.
Christian Romans killed far more pagans than pagan Romans had killed Christians.
Please, God of the Jews/Christians/Moslems, would you harmonize our „true believers“?

990114         Popularity made to overrule the law

The gullibility spell the unrepentant Clinton and mass media have cast on the American public is remarkable. ”Legally correct” polls insinuate that most people support a twisted president with rubbery morality.
After being accused of perjury, he unleashed the grotesque bombing of Iraq on Dec. 16, ’98, the day before his scheduled impeachment hearing. Dec. 19, 1998 he stopped it, for 3 discernible reasons beyond failure: it didn’t prevent his impeachment, he doesn’t have enough missiles, and the cost is outrageous.
What sane commander-in-chief preordains a “4-day-only” attack without military or strategic possibilities other than strengthening the enemy’s resolve and ridiculing America? How many billions does he squander, how many soldiers, ships and planes does he send to nowhere to hit 1 flea with 3 bazookas and kill innocent bystanders?
This alone could be reason for impeachment.
He has a weaseling explanation for his spinning: “all is relative”.
How long before we recognize that Clinton is bent on “deconstructing” our culture? If his “popularity” overrules the law and the Constitution, why don’t we dismantle our courts and government in favor of mob rule, as it happened with other famous demagogues?
Deceivers would want to look just as handsome, charismatic and angelic as Clinton. What else can explain the surrealistic democrat lockstep against impeachment?
They officially denounce his moral turpitude, propose the most severe censure, and then go straight to the White House to offer him their oiliness and servitude.
Their interests are hopelessly trapped in their fraudulent promotion that he influenced the economy and has international statesmanship. If they succeed against impeachment, every future president knows he can safely lie under oath, spin weaseling morality pretzels, and use any room in the White House for cathouse fornication.
The smug feeling of sophistication presumed in today’s relativistic philosophy is a primary cause of general decay. With that, any criticism can be dismissed with a contemptuous “you are entitled to your opinion” or “everything is relative”. Clintonian weaselers are putting “However” after each of the Ten Commandments, and menacing to mutate Washington (or USA?) into an inmate-run asylum.

990211      Two party rule: the evil and the stupid

Over 100 potential witnesses to Clinton schemes ended in jail, murder, suicide, fled abroad, invoked the 5th amendment, or were somehow eliminated for deviating from the Clintonian lockstep.
“Filegate” reveals that Clinton illegally got confidential files on notable non-Clintonians to blackmail and/or silence Gingrich, Hyde, Livingston and countless others.
Many were “filegated” into proposing that the unrepenting Clinton be forgiven and immunized against future prosecution.
His State of the Union address culminated in “mass distraction” and his proposal of federalizing the stock market through Social Security.
Captive lawyers use junk jurisprudence to explain why no one is above the law except Clinton.
They are the ones who can be “ethical” in legalizing abominable conduct.
Clinton committed much worse sex “improprieties” than senator Packwood and even increased his popularity, whereas Packwood was politically executed. This is just as surrealistic as the House democrats’ opposition to impeaching Clinton because they had not cross-examined the witnesses they had refused to see, or because his law-breaking is “not impeachable”.
They insist we should not impeach Clinton because he is popular with the voters. So were Genghis Khan, Hitler, Stalin and others while the opinion tides supported them.
Our morality is now contaminated by one-dimensional media who condone wrongdoing that the laws condemn. Even churches are under pressure to approve abomination.
Clinton prevails by affinity wherever “Princess Di” is more popular than Mother Teresa.
We have trapped ourselves in a two-party monopoly: ” the evil and the stupid”.
Clinton’s hijacking of the merit for our prosperity is like the claim that the cockroach in the keel is steering the ocean liner.
What if ALL republicans vote for impeaching Clinton and ALL democrats against? That is political prostitution with sophisticated articulation of lucrative hypocrisy that scorns history, culture and morality.
Evil politicians bamboozle gullible voters; and the mediocre majority, which can be amoral in most societies, intimidates mediocre politicians, who are the majority in most governments.
Sodom and Gomorrah’s inhabitants did not think, “I want to be evil and depraved”. They scoffed at the happiness of demanding virtues and slouched into the destructive addiction to easy pleasures.

990303       Can our parties be re-educated?

Posturing the unions, blacks, ultra-feminists, and homosexuals against conservatism has become a political habit and a semantic trap.
It is undeniable that blacks who succeed on their own are far better off than the purely government protected, that man-hating gender feminists and confrontational homosexuals have painted themselves into bleak corners, and that employer-hating unions are losing contact with reality.
Beyond predicting the disastrous results of affirmative action, conservatives advocate black progress beyond simplistic “equality with the whites” whose maximum result would be sterile imitation and servile gratitude to the whites.
Explaining why and how conservatives promote women’s interests even more than the traditional feminists, without the gender feminist hatred for man, family, and heterosexuality would let true feminism regain its natural dignity. And non-confrontational homosexuals can become socially, financially and politically successful like anyone else. Unions cannot just preach class struggle against the employers. Both unions and employers could certainly become cooperative and mutually useful.
As long as the bargaining parties concentrate on common goals, common necessity will prevail over the destructive class struggle. This is a practical, psychological and emotional responsibility that employees and employers understand better than most politicians.
The main project would be reeducation of both parties. Honest goodwill can solve this problem.
The republicans are doomed to lose as long as they are unable to formulate the appropriate educational messages. Those messages must necessarily be detailed, but the vast majority of Americans are TV watchers with a short attention span.
They want the short glib statements designed for the “general public”. That is fortunate for the democrats, because long detailed explanations would expose evidence against their self-defeating dogoodism.
The republicans know why the democrats are wrong, but they cannot convey what they believe to be right. Like the democrats, they only send us financial contribution forms and one-dimensional questionnaires to fill with preordained answers to rhetoric questions.
Both parties,  don’t seem to trust the intelligence of contributing supporters, although they claim the opposite. Considering the required membership standards in today’s political organizations, we could spin Groucho Marx’s comment: “I don’t want to be member of a club that would accept me”.

990405         Clinton blunders in the Balkans

Tempting Armageddon, Clinton’s sophisticated primitivism can deceive NATO/USA but he misses history’s lessons. His unconstitutional self-glorifying war against a sovereign nation without US Congress authorization and against international law, for “moral grounds”, spreads war in order to “prevent spreading the war”.
His being an incurable deceiver, liar, and accused rapist (someone may suggest euphemisms) adds nightmare to disaster.
Kosovo is a Serbian patriotic holy land where the Serbians spilled their blood for several centuries to save Europe against the attacking Islamism: a heroic tradition beyond life-and-death.
Without the instigation and weapons from anti-Christianity/anti-West Muslims and other foreigners, the Kosovo ethnic Muslim Albanians would have continued their assimilation into Yugoslavia, which is the best solution in the Balkans.
International law forbids intervention by foreign countries. Without proper guidance, unsophisticated Kosovo Albanians can only implement terrorism.
In every nation, terrorism by minority citizens can only be handled with force. Especially in a multicultural approach, their assimilation and converging evolution are the normal peaceful solution. That is what resulted into the Western and most other cultures.
The Kosovo/Albanian future lies in assimilation into a sister culture which has developed faster.
We cannot embalm them in what they are now, as we try to do with the Native Americans.
This tragically Clintonian war is only matched by Clinton’s non-reaction to the massacres of millions of Tutsis, Hutus, Sudanese, Chinese and many others who deserved help hundreds of times more urgently than the Kosovo/Albanian Muslims.
He watched those atrocities with fully open eyes. The explanation that such genocides did not menace the rest of the world would thus make them acceptable.
They say that USA/NATO have nothing against the Orthodox-Christian Serbians. Thus: we may kill Serbians as long as we have nothing against them.
Military history shows how to defeat America: promote a leftist Trojan horse as American president, let him neuter our military, demoralize and scatter them in enormously expensive and futile deployments against world opinion, then hit USA unexpectedly.
What did Clinton do for our military beyond forcing them into accepting homosexuals, cutting armaments and wasting our soldiers worldwide? Clinton is preparing to sacrifice American troops next. Only Clinton can overbalkanize the Balkans.

990502                     The Clinton touch

After “intervention” by Clinton, Haiti, Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan and others sank and were abandoned in their worsened misery.
Virtually all persons and countries involved in Clintonian initiatives were fatally contaminated.
Whatever Clinton touches decays or perishes.
Only our economy remained undamaged, because he was not allowed to influence it.
His one-way war to Serbia “to preserve peace” and to “prevent spreading the killing and war” is creating an expanded war and multiplying the killings.
Where was Clinton when over 200,000 Serbs were being massacred in Bosnia and by Iran-supported Kosovo Muslim Albanians?
Although his attacks on Serbia make no political or military sense, they certainly work as convenient diversions from his being accused of rape, just as his useless attacks on Iraq –still continuing now- spelled diversion from his impeachment and strengthened Saddam Hussein.
Meanwhile, Italy is shocked by a flood of crimes by immigrating Albanians. Many are in jails, where they declare: “..We are better off in Italian prisons than anywhere in Albania.” Albania stagnated for many centuries as the poorest, most illiterate and anti-European Muslim country in Europe.
Their major pride is how much they contributed to the Muslim Ottoman invasion against Serbia and Europe since six centuries ago.
They embraced Islam, and became a dismembered body of discordant communities, until they were colonized and culturally infected by communist China and North Korea.
Now, deprived of their potential and reduced to fractious terrorism, many Albanians are trying to find a future by fleeing to Italy and Germany for a new way of life.
They are much worse than Milosevic, because of their ruthless anti-Western and anti-Christian problems. The Senate unimpeachment of Clinton unleashed his Balkan slaughter (again: anti-Western/anti-Christian).
He is now lobotomizing the American opinion about his “unavoidable” sacrifice of “any number” of American youth and Serbian civilians.
Meanwhile, pro-Serbia Russians may manage to reenact their WW1 collapse and their subsequent growth into USSR, after all enemies ignored them in 1917. How would we react if, after their present collapse, they resurged by hitting our major cities?
They could win because we cannot fight their disjointed confusion. Knowingly or not, Clinton may be hatching the Russian-Siberian Armageddon egg.

990602             Clinton’s international slaughter  

America is not Clintonland.
Clinton bombs Serbia to divert attention from his Pornocchio image, and NATO tries to delay its own overdue dissolution by fabricating a war pretext.
They fail, must massacre innocents “to save our face” and brand “ethnic cleansing” a minor Serbian civil war.
Without provocation, Clinton bombs a sovereign nation without declaring war, against the international laws and the American Constitution.
Preventing the massacres is his declared “humanitarian” purpose, but he kills many more, gets away with calling the carnage “collateral damage”, and with claiming he has “nothing against the Serbs”.
Then he declares Milosevic a “war criminal” for shooting back Albanian Muslim terrorists (mortal enemies of Western-Christian civilization).
He sublimes his alleged rape of Juanita Broaddrick into deliberately raping a sovereign nation, which is not even an enemy.
Clinton, the peacenik, campaigned in Europe against America’s violence in Vietnam, and now is an unstoppable slayer of defenseless victims by bombers hitting from a cowardly (“safe”) distance.
By proclaiming Serbian crimes without confirmation by any international court or any other non-propaganda source, he is creating more enemies and degrading America’s moral stature in the unchangeable annals of history.
All this is happening because the Senate refused to impeach him.
If we accept Clinton’s international slaughter, we become a mindless herd of accomplices sinking into anti-Western culture barbarism.
This is America, not Clintonia.
Clinton, his subservient military/diplomatic bureaucrats and NATO pompous puppets are degrading the historical mission of America.
Rejecting him and killing his war may be our only way out of national disgrace.
If Clinton had helped Albania build the necessary organization to absorb the Kosovo refugees, instead of bombing Serbia into destruction, he would have brought primitive Albania and Muslim Kosovan Albanians into civilization, conquered Yugoslavia’s undying gratitude, saved countless lives and motivated Russia’s cooperation against China. Clinton’s shallowness cannot conceive a solution for both contenders.
His one-dimensional mind can only produce a destructive lust for video-game victories against non-opponents carefully chosen among those who don’t have a chance to defend themselves.
He is even planning the disastrous financing and training of ragtag Muslim “Kosovo Liberation Army” terrorists against Serbia.
The Clinton syndrome has desensitized voters to the point that they cannot feel the unspeakable outrage of being tricked into supporting an international murder-suicide.

990702             Kosovo: a historical hoax

Clinton’s wickedness induced Congress to impeach him, and reelection strategy caused the Senate to unimpeach and unleash him as an operetta Genghis Khan against Serbia, virtually at the service of the most primitive, anti-Christian, anti-West ethnic terrorists in Europe.
That immunized Serbia, Russia and potentially Albania against America.
Serbia, Kosovo and NATO are three more Clinton-curse targets after Haiti, Somalia, Irak, , Bosnia, Whitewatergate, Chinagate, other Xgates and other tragic blunders.
Like before, he and his followers celebrate the apotheosis of his macabre victory, followed by the carefully glossed-over reality that he brought by far much more death and destruction than Milosevic.
Now, he is frantically manufacturing and distorting evidence of Milosevic crimes.
A statesman should have enabled Albania to host the Kosovar refugees, earned Albanian, Serbian and Russian gratitude, and promoted Balkan harmony.
He added the Napoleonic delusion of conducting “the first moral war in history” with the moral stature of a prostitute who claims virginity.
History will also show that Serbian/Kosovar civil war casualties were neither “genocide” nor “holocausts”.
“Saving NATO’s existence”, like reviving a zombie, is inducing the European Union to replace the anti-Russia NATO with a European military organization without America.
Opposing the raids and terrorism of the KLA and their Albanian and Iranian instigators (also mortal Musllim enemies of Western-Christian civilization) was necessary, even if the opposition was directed by an alleged “criminal” like Milosevic (3-times democratically elected).
To fight Hitler, Roosevelt had to ally America with Stalin, who was even worse than Hitler.
Compared to them, Milosevic is a minor pussycat.
Milosevic surrendered to protect his people against someone (Clinton) like a loathsome terrorist or kidnapper who keeps killing hostages until he gets what he wants.
Like a hostage-killing terrorist, Clinton crows that none of his men died, but for each American survivor he killed countless innocent non-enemy victims, as if they were insects.
Now, let’s watch compassionate Clinton and his NATO lapdogs forcing the return of bloodthirsty anti-Western-anti-Christian culture Kosovars to their non-homes: like re-injecting AIDS into a victim because a non-approved physician had cured it.
The extra-careful wording and the $5-million reward to buy evidence against Milosevic specifically (not against a true culprit, but against a still-to-be-proven-guilty Milosevic) may be covering a monstrous historical hoax.

990805  U.S. medicine Trojan-horses socialized medicine

I was unexpectedly railroaded into open-heart surgery, although I was jogging 3.5 miles daily and felt greatest. After surgery, evidence popped that my previous chest pain was only from a healing broken rib.
Coincidental pettiness happened after changing doctors.
A receptionist rejected me because I refused to describe my symptoms loudly with a crowd waiting behind me.
A clerk’s refusal to schedule urgent help made me cancel a business trip to Holland.
I’m not allowed to talk with a physician to request references or his background previous to our first appointment. Paramedics choose a doctor for me, despite my protests. My protests are ignored.
I go to the appointment, and busy assembly people process me. Someone comes with impatient clipped questions, but he is the wrong doctor. I get peremptory written instructions and sign papers with sneaky small print that I cannot read in the allotted time.
Medics and paramedics sign nothing.
I am refused service unless I publicly reveal my birth date, insurance card, driver license, social security, and whatever no-nonsense clerks fancy, even when I go to a hospital-owned shop to get an earplug for swimming, in spite of my cash payment.
I go for a test and my records falsely show that I have high blood pressure and a never tested allergy.
Other doctors found that I was allergic to wheat (wrong) and milk (never tested).
Other doctors, who also judged my heart surgery unnecessary, found no allergies.
Monopolized medical business snatches many hapless doctors and subtly intimidates the competent physicians majority, who “don’t want to have any trouble”.
They become unwitting Trojan horses of socialized medicine devastation.
Hillary Clinton glorifies European nationalized medicine, but not the drama of a superbly competent executive lady I had hired to work foe me in London, who couldn’t come to America, because she was dying of cervical cancer, which her socialized medical system had diagnosed in time but scheduled for surgery too late.
Receptionists, medical aids, lab technicians, paralegals, bookkeepers, bureaucrats and/or their aids make determining decisions that only a doctor-patient encounter should make.
They explain how they have good reasons.
Nothing is worse than arbitrary wrongs done for “good reasons”.

990903                         "Abortion: Destroyer of peace"

Abort abortion Headline, 9 Aug. 1999: “Crime drop linked to abortion”.
Just as brilliant as: “Headaches drop linked to decapitation”.
Did it mean: legalizing abortions decriminalizes them? Nope.
“Legalized Abortion and Crime” (by Steven Levitt and John Donohue) explains: “..Many women whose children would have been most likely to commit crimes as young adults instead chose to abort their pregnancies”.
That means that the most immature, ignorant and uneducated wantonly pronounce and execute death sentences. However, many non-aborted children of such women became famous scientists, philosophers, artists and geniuses in many fields.
Even Hitler’s mother should not have aborted, because little Adolf could have become a harmless citizen if he had found clever sponsors and sufficient rewards for keeping quiet.
On the other hand, some monstrous criminals born of wealthy loving parents may tempt abortionists to abort entire generations.
We could also legislate super-Holocaust abortions as a patriotic duty, if the outlook for next generation’s welfare looks bleak. Besides, too many cases are not so simple.
Pundit Hillary Clinton reveals that having a mother and grandmother hate each other could promote boundless promiscuity and mouth-to-genitals for the male offspring.
Since my mother and grandmother were mutually sympathetic, I wonder what made my life so exciting.
On Feb. 4, 1994, on a prayer breakfast in Washington, DC, with Bill/Hillary Clinton sitting behind her, Mother Teresa emphasized publicly:
“… The greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child – murder by the mother herself. And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another?”
Hillary’s all-out campaign for unconditional government support of abortion is well known.
On June 22, 1999 the socialist government of Moslem Albania incongruously presented Hillary Clinton with the Catholic “Mother Teresa Award” in Skopje, Macedonia, “…in the spirit of the victory of mankind over inhuman action”.
The Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights commented: “If Hillary Clinton were a decent woman, she would not accept this award”.
If still alive, Albanian-born Catholic Mother Teresa would have certainly agreed.           

991010                         Education or bigotry

Our organizations to fight racism beat dead horses and generate self-feeding hostilities.
America has fewer prejudices than most other countries.
What is left is the residual lunacy that only apolitical EDUCATION can correct.
Furthermore, we should praise America for having fought the greatest war against racism, in which about one white man died for every 3 blacks living then in America.
No other nation did so much against slavery.
Recognition coming from such awareness promotes many times more mutual understanding than resentful civil right crusades.
Handling innate racism with just “bad dog!” admonitions assures trouble perpetuation.
Racism has become the paralyzed dragon that cannot distress the damsel who doesn’t need the knight who craves the reward for saving her.
True, the paralyzed dragon is still a nuisance, but not as bad as the prejudices against me as a foreigner in other countries, or against my moving to USA from South America (5 year waiting in 1955 because I was Italian, against 1 month for my German wife), or in USA itself for employment (“no Negroes, Catholics, Hispanics or Italians”, and “Chemist? But aren’t you Italian?”), and when I started to learn English at age 31.
I refused well-intentioned help to move into an Italian or German neighborhood, because I wanted acculturation, not ethnic isolation.
I became chemical research director and then started a hi-tech business, simply because I worry more about protected alienation than about failure.
The main protection victims are now the blacks.
Is “black” so bad that they have to be repainted as “African American”?
Why are they told that Cleopatra was black, Aristotle stole his philosophy from the Alexandria Library (built after his death), that Timbuktu was a world center of books before the printing press was invented? To make them resent, be resented, and look stupid?
They are offered help that would only establish cultural handicaps.
The troublemakers are those, white and black, who profit from black troubles.
All that blacks need is to cultivate knowledge and skills.
Only self-destructive racists refuse knowledgeable and skillful coworkers.
Who, black or white, would work with racists anyhow?

991106        Slouching into recycled socialism

Our government and the telephone companies are sliding into symbiotic coexistence.
Calling a government agency means being pinball tossed among answering machines.
The taxpayer wastes high telephone bills. Who gains? The telephone company, who owes it to the government, who is indebted to the telephone company.
They reinforce each other in an undeclared collusion, which marginalizes the individual.
This government/big-organizations symbiosis is growing all around us, and we keep voting a government that legislates paradoxical protection of citizen groups against the citizen.
Example: I brought a car to a large dealership service dept. for a checkup previous to a trip. They charged me about $1900 for repairs.
The trip was a disaster because the most critical repairs had been paid and not done.
I was almost killed, stalled in the middle of a speedway in a curve.
Says the car-mall service manager: "Our service is unionized and we have to accept what they say and charge you. There is nothing we can do".
Thus, some union/employer collusions share the interest in defrauding the customer.
Sending and charging several high-wage men-hours for one-man-1-hour jobs become normal.
That is: government/big-employers/organized-employees together exploit the citizenry in a recycled socialism, manipulated in capitalistic fashion.
Groveling media cooperate by describing the exploited and exploiters to justify and promote progressive tightening of government controls.
Even little entrepreneurs like plumbers, electricians and others are lured into similar deceptive conspiracies, but they and the unions end irreversibly straight jacketed in nationwide regulations.
Even organized physicians are manipulated into forming unions that will eventually converge physicians and HMOs into a bureaucratized medical despotism over patients.
Medicine bureaucratization is already being rehearsed with methodology typical of socialistic systems.
The captive doctors are baited into anti-patient protection and the patients are intimidated and domesticated.
A doctor who has a dispute with his organization is deprived of his patients who, like cattle, have nothing to say (even if the appearances are carefully staged to show the opposite).
The taxpayer, the customer (or "client"), the citizen, the "working men-and-women" are one-by-one used and bled dry to be gradually homogenized into the "new world".
Going to court?. It is our right, but lawyer fees make sure that winning costs us more than losing...
Have we not learned enough from the Soviet nightmare?

991205             Family is always central

In the TV show “Touched by an angel”, a feminist angel states: “Family is a democracy”.
Democratizing the family degenerates it.
Democracy is electoral, whereas family is a patriarchal or matriarchal hierarchy.
In democracy, voters pre-exist and elect their leaders.
Family is the indivisible nucleus of reproductive life and civilization, in which parents generate and raise their children.
Children electing their parents is as absurd as a consequence choosing or erasing its only cause.
Another apparently wise exhortation, “respect your father(mother) because he(she) is right” is slyly anti-family. The rule has been for millennia: “Respect your father(mother), because he(she) is your parent”, regardless of whether he is right.
“Because he(she) is right” confuses the parent with anybody. Unquestioning obedience to the parents builds character, trains children to face social realities and to become parents.
The authority to resolve irreconcilable differences then must return to the head of the family, whose concern and love reaches much further than judges and bureaucrats can.
The objection that some parents are unworthy is an anti-family rationalization.
Unworthy parents are mostly conflicting narcissistic misfits who cannot characterize a family.
Democracy may heed the Machiavellian practical exhortation “Men ought not to do as they ought to do but ought to do as they do do”, whereas family can be inspired by healthy ideals to strive toward a “perfection” we may continuously approach and never achieve. What else do we think evolution is or ought to be?
Democratized “role models” are poor substitutes which are debunked when their personifications fail or are surpassed.
The family, more than a safety haven, is an evolution nucleus to nurture and do “as they ought to do”, also if the parents cannot do what they expect from their children.
Even a prostitute can motivate her daughter into chastity, just as some paralyzed coach can train an athletic team. Laws to control interaction between father, mother and child mostly tend to hollow the family’s essence and fatten vultures who gain from family dissolution.
Since anti-family and pro-abortion activists are politically more feared than pro-family and pro-life citizens, government measures “to protect the family” degenerate family and mankind in facilitating divorce, abortion and one-parent “families”.

20000105         Yesterday’s fantasy is today’s reality

WHERETO FROM HERE?
Enter a public place naked in 1980 and you are arrested, but not in 2000, unless you are smoking at the same time. Tell an ethnic or black joke, and you may end in jail or jobless for life.
Yet it is OK to ridicule any church, immerse a Crucifix in urine, or paint the Virgin Mary surrounded by elephant excrement and rotted sex organs.
About two thirds of the blacks and about 20% of the whites are born by unmarried women.
Furthermore, we may shack up and murder any child while he is being born.
Years ago, a homosexual would confess his problem to a minister and seek help. Today, the homosexual himself may be the performing minister.
Crucifixes and prayers are forbidden in public places, yet “in God we trust” is on our dollar bills.
“Progressive” judges pervert the constitution through arbitrary unconstitutional decisions.
Our public schools are the anticultural fraud of the century, designed to morally and culturally lobotomize defenseless children with ”self esteem” and politically corrupted indoctrination, and muzzle the competent teachers in favor of compact voting teacher unions, politicians and bureaucrats.
Too often, no proof is necessary to convict a man of rape or child molestation.
Lives of innocent men have been irreversibly ruined with fabricated quack “recovered-memory” accusations by women and toddlers.
The IRS and police may arrest people and sequester properties without due process.
Postmodern feminism fights against males and heterosexual family, and for using males only as sperm donors.
One generation ago Nelson Rockefeller lost the presidential candidacy because he had been divorced.
In 1999, Clinton used the White House as a third rate cathouse to commit multiple adulteries and depraved debauchery with interns and other victims.
He was constitutionally impeached by the House, unconstitutionally unimpeached by the Senate, and declared in contempt by a federal court.
Upon being accused of rape, he scurried into a criminal undeclared war that killed countless thousands of innocent civilians and multiplied the number of “genocide murders” his war was supposed to prevent.
Not many years ago, the above would have been psychopathic fantasy.
Now, the year 2000 has to cope with the Clintonian legacy.    

20000208             What will the ‘100th monkey’ do?

THE 100th MONKEY BUSINESS.
In 1952, zoologists observed Macaca Fuscata monkeys risk starvation in the island of Koshima, Japan, because they couldn’t clean the dirt off sweet potatoes or fruits they found on the ground.
Some monkeys were taught by zoologists to wash them in creeks and ponds. That helped them, but too slowly to influence the others, until all monkeys, close-by and distant, almost suddenly knew how to wash the potatoes in 1958, because the number of the learning monkeys had grown enough to motivate all the others.
The hypothetical monkey that completed the number to make the difference was conventionally called “the 100th monkey”.
Many people ridicule or persecute a man who insists with warnings or exhortations about a particular danger. Mostly, they will heed him only when he is the “100th monkey”.
Many who persist in exposing unpleasant matters like our public schooling system, or our decaying morals, may end up demonized like senator Joe McCarthy.
He was not preceded by the symbolic 99 that would make him the convincing 100th monkey. His defects and blunders doomed him to failure anyhow, and the monkeys were on the other side, but armed with the “ad hominem” accusations typical of lynch mobs and other fanatics.
For instance, some leftists would now accuse me of defending McCarthy because I condemn their bigotry. The same obtusity as branding a conservative as “homophobic/ sexist/racist/Euro-male/anti-abortionist/Judeo-Christian”. In 1997, a group of scholars published in France “The livre noir du communisme » (“The black book of communism”), with undisputable documentation of how over 80-100 million people had been murdered since 1917 for resisting communism. I was in Paris and experienced knee-jerk overreaction by local leftists against the book. Later, I saw only a German and an Italian translation of that book, until Harvard University Press published the English version only last November (1999). Will it have similar postmodernist leftists detractors like those I met in France? Someone said, “Not even God can change the past”. Postmodernists are trying to do precisely that.
It might depend on which side the 100th monkey will take. Merely for completing the number after the 99th, or for the morality and justice of his stand?

20000307             Historic events: the genes of culture

Postmodernist “anti-cultural education” is based on the dogmatic and unscientific assumption that children are cultural aliens to their parents. The parents who raise them are “intrusive, oppressive”, if not directed by “professionals” (that is, psychologic pedagogy technicians, social workers and bureaucrats).
Furthermore, children should be free to develop their own culture, removed from the “oppressive parental guidance”.
Anticulturalist educators preach that, rather than knowledge of any subject, children only need the freedom to find out by themselves anything they want, without guidance.
Accordingly, no one needs to introduce them to quantum physics, thermodynamics or existential epistemology.
The present result is that those who are raised with anticultural education, as above recommended, cannot even attempt to teach their own children, because their education deprived them of the ability to return to content-based education, or to teach teachers the subjects to teach.
Those who don’t know history state self-assuredly that “ we don’t need history”.
Ignoring history is to culture the same as ignoring a person’s genes. The events of history are like the genes of culture.
Anticultural specialists are